You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 5, May 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Laparoscopic Reoperation for Failed Antireflux Procedures

Myriam J. Curet, MD, FACS; Robert K. Josloff, MD; Othmar Schoeb, MD; Karl A. Zucker, MD

Arch Surg. 1999;134:559-563.

Background  Laparoscopic fundoplication has become the criterion standard for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Recently, several patients were referred with recurrent symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease or severe dysphagia following previous antireflux surgery for possible laparoscopic reoperation.

Hypothesis  To determine the safety and efficacy of this procedure.

Design  Case series, consecutive sample.

Setting  University-affiliated and community tertiary care hospitals.

Patients  Prospective study of 27 consecutive patients undergoing attempted laparoscopic reoperation for symptoms of recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease or intractable dysphagia following antireflux surgery. Patients were available for follow-up for 1 to 60 months postoperatively.

Interventions  All patients underwent preoperative workup and attempted laparoscopic reoperation for treatment of symptoms.

Main Outcome Measures  Data were collected on preoperative symptoms and evaluation, operative time, blood loss, time to regular diet, length of hospitalization, morbidity, mortality, and long-term results.

Results  Twenty-six patients underwent successful laparoscopic operations, with no mortality and minimal morbidity. One patient underwent conversion to open laparotomy and then developed a proximal gastric leak, which was treated conservatively. Twenty-four patients began a liquid diet by postoperative day 1, and most were discharged from the hospital by postoperative day 3. One patient required dilation for postoperative dysphagia. The remaining patients are doing well and none have required treatment with acid-reducing medication.

Conclusions  Although technically challenging, laparoscopic reoperation for recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease can be performed safely and with excellent results. In the hands of experienced endoscopic surgeons, patients who have undergone unsuccessful antireflux surgery should be offered laparoscopic reoperation.


From the Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque (Dr Curet); Abington Memorial Hospital, Abington, Pa (Dr Josloff); the Department of Surgery, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (Dr Schoeb); and the University of Arizona School of Medicine, Phoenix (Dr Zucker).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Long-term results of redo gastro-esophageal reflux disease surgery
Avaro et al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2008;33:1091-1095.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical Reintervention After Antireflux Surgery for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Cohort Study in 130 Patients
Furnee et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:267-274.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reoperative laparoscopic fundoplication for the treatment of failed fundoplication
Papasavas et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2004;128:509-516.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.