You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 5, May 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (48)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Public Health
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Reasons Why Trauma Surgeons Fail to Screen for Alcohol Problems

Per E. Danielsson, MD; Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH; Larry M. Gentilello, MD; Ronald V. Maier, MD

Arch Surg. 1999;134:564-568.

Background  Alcohol screening and intervention have been recommended as routine components of trauma care but are rarely performed.

Hypothesis  An association exists between current screening and counseling practices and the trauma surgeon's knowledge, attitude, and perceived role and responsibility toward alcohol problems.

Participants  Random-sample survey (n=241) of members of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

Main Outcome Measures  Reported screening and counseling practices.

Results  Fifty-four percent of respondents screened 25% or fewer patients, while only 29% screened most patients. The most common reason for not screening was "lack of time." Most (76%) were not familiar with the most common clinically used screening questionnaires, and 83% reported no training in alcohol screening. Screening was more likely if attending physicians perceived a major responsibility for screening (P<.001). Nonscreeners were twice as likely to state screening was "not what I was trained to do" and more frequently believed screening offends patients (P=.001). Independent predictors of screening were perceived major role responsibility (odds ratio [OR], 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-4.01) and confidence in screening ability (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.05-3.67) and counseling ability (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.34-3.85). Eighty-eight percent of respondents would be willing to devote time to training if shown that counseling is effective.

Conclusions  Lack of screening and counseling appears to be due to cognitive factors, not lack of motivation. Skills on how to screen and counsel for alcohol abuse should be taught to trauma surgeons, because a strong correlation exists between screening and confidence in skills. There is a need for education regarding results of effective intervention trials in medical settings.


From the Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center (Drs Danielsson, Rivara, Gentilello, and Maier) and the Departments of Pediatrics (Dr Rivara), Surgery (Dr Gentilello), and Epidemiology (Dr Maier), University of Washington, Seattle.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Simple advice for injured hazardous drinkers: an implementation study
Rodriguez-Martos et al.
Alcohol Alcohol 2007;42:430-435.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Testing for Substance Use in Trauma Patients: Are We Doing Enough?
London and Battistella
Arch Surg 2007;142:633-638.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary Care Utilization and Detection of Emotional Distress After Adolescent Traumatic Injury: Identifying an Unmet Need
Sabin et al.
Pediatrics 2006;117:130-138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Somatic, Posttraumatic Stress, and Depressive Symptoms Among Injured Patients Treated in Trauma Surgery
Zatzick et al.
Psychosomatics 2003;44:479-484.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.