You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 7, July 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (44)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Reoperative Parathyroid Surgery in the Era of Sestamibi Scanning and Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring

Geoffrey B. Thompson, MD; Clive S. Grant, MD; Nancy D. Perrier, MD; Richard Harman, MD; Stephen F. Hodgson, MD; Duane Ilstrup, MS; Jon A. van Heerden, MB

Arch Surg. 1999;134:699-705.

Hypothesis  Results of reoperative parathyroid surgery (RPS) have improved with the advent of sestamibi parathyroid subtraction scanning and intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring.

Design  Retrospective review of patient histories, preoperative localization studies, operative data, including IOPTH monitoring, and outcomes for patients undergoing recent RPS at a single institution. Follow-up was complete (mean, 20 months).

Setting  Tertiary care referral center.

Patients  All patients undergoing RPS for benign persistent or recurrent primary hyperparathyroidism during the period 1989 to 1997.

Main Outcome Measures  Overall cure rate and operative morbidity from RPS; sensitivity and accuracy of preoperative localization studies; and prediction of cure from IOPTH monitoring.

Results  The study group included 124 patients (87 women and 37 men). Hypercalcemia was corrected in 109 patients (88%). Permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve injury occurred in 0.8% and permanent hypoparathyroidism in 13% of patients. Test sensitivities and accuracies, respectively, were as follows: ultrasound with biopsy, 90% and 82%; sestamibi parathyroid subtraction scanning, 82% and 67%; and ultrasound alone, 75% and 65%. Level of IOPTH was predictive of cure in all patients with a 70% or greater fall from baseline at 20 minutes after excision. Persistent multigland disease was the major cause for reoperative failure (73%).

Conclusions  Neither cure rates nor operative morbidity have changed appreciably over the past 2 decades, despite the introduction of sestamibi parathyroid subtraction scanning and IOPTH monitoring. Multigland disease continues to represent the principal cause of failure in RPS despite the routine use of preoperative localization studies. Thus far, increasing the stringency of IOPTH monitoring from a 50% to 70% decline from baseline levels has been predictive of cure, even in multigland disease. Most missed abnormal glands reside in normal anatomic locations, and the need for multiple operations, not just the reoperation, results in the increased morbidity seen with RPS.


From the Division of Gastroenterologic and General Surgery (Drs Thompson, Grant, Perrier, and Harman, and Mr van Heerden), Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, Nutrition, and Internal Medicine (Dr Hodgson), and the Section of Biostatistics (Mr Ilstrup), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Percutaneous Parathyroid Ethanol Ablation in Patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1
Veldman et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;191:1740-1744.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Parathyroid Hormone Venous Sampling Before Reoperative Surgery in Renal Hyperparathyroidism: Comparison With Noninvasive Localization Procedures and Review of the Literature
Seehofer et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:1331-1338.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rapid Intraoperative Immunoassay of Parathyroid Hormone and Other Hormones: A New Paradigm for Point-of-Care Testing
Sokoll et al.
Clin. Chem. 2004;50:1126-1135.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intraoperative Monitoring of Parathyroid Hormone with a Rapid Automated Assay that is Commercially Available
Kao et al.
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory Science 2002;32:244-251.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pitfalls of Intraoperative Quick Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring and Gamma Probe Localization in Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism
Jaskowiak et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:659-669.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical and Surgical Management of Hyperparathyroidism
Kearns and Thompson
Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:87-91.
ABSTRACT  

The Influence of Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring on the Surgical Management of Hyperparathyroidism
Mandell et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:821-827.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relative Contributions of Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi Scintigraphy, Intraoperative Gamma Probe Detection, and the Rapid Parathyroid Hormone Assay to the Surgical Management of Hyperparathyroidism
Dackiw et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:550-557.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.