You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 8, August 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (42)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Ultrasonography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Localization of Insulinomas

Milana P. Boukhman, BA; John M. Karam, MD; John Shaver, MD; Allan E. Siperstein, MD; Alfred A. DeLorimier, MD; Orlo H. Clark, MD

Arch Surg. 1999;134:818-823.

Hypothesis  Intraoperative ultrasonography is more sensitive than preoperative and other intraoperative techniques for localizing insulinoma.

Design  Retrospective review.

Setting  A tertiary referral center.

Patients  All patients with a biochemical diagnosis of organic hyperinsulinism who were referred to University of California, San Francisco, from 1975 to 1998.

Methods  Sensitivities of the localization techniques for insulinoma were evaluated.

Results  The sensitivities of tumor localization with arteriography, computed tomography, preoperative ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium, transhepatic venous sampling, palpation, and intraoperative ultrasonography were 47%, 24%, 50%, 30%, 40%, 55%, 76%, and 91%, respectively. Nine of the 11 nonpalpable and nonvisible tumors at operation were localized by intraoperative ultrasonography.

Conclusion  The currently available preoperative localization tests are not reliable enough to be recommended when intraoperative ultrasonography is available.


From the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Giant Insulinoma: Case Report and Review of the Literature
Mittendorf et al.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005;90:575-580.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laparoscopic Localization and Resection of Insulinomas
Jaroszewski et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:270-274.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preoperative Detection of Pancreatic Insulinomas on Multiphasic Helical CT
Fidler et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003;181:775-780.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Imaging pancreatic islet cell tumours
Power and Reznek
Imaging 2002;14:147-159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intraoperative Ultrasound and Preoperative Localization Detects All Occult Insulinomas
Hiramoto et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:1020-1026.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.