 |
 |

Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers
Outcome and Efficacy in 30 Consecutive Patients
Namir Katkhouda, MD;
Eli Mavor, MD;
Rodney J. Mason, MD, PhD;
Guilherme M. R. Campos, MD;
Ardeshir Soroushyari, MD;
Thomas V. Berne, MD
Arch Surg. 1999;134:845-850.
Hypothesis Laparoscopic management of perforated duodenal ulcers is safe and effective.
Design Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial.
Setting Tertiary care academic center.
Patients and Methods Between October 1993 and October 1997, 30 patients underwent laparoscopic Graham patch repair of perforated duodenal ulcers and 16 had an open repair.
Main Outcome Measures Morbidity, operating time, analgesic requirements, length of hospital stay, and time to return to work.
Results There was no difference in morbidity between the 2 groups. Operating time was longer in the laparoscopy group (106 vs 63 minutes; P=.001). Patients with shock on admission or symptoms for more than 24 hours had a higher conversion rate (P<.05). The laparoscopy group required fewer analgesics, had a shorter stay, and a quicker recovery.
Conclusions Laparoscopic repair for perforated ulcers is safe and maintains benefits of the minimally invasive approach. Laparoscopy is not beneficial in patients with shock.
From the Division of Emergency Non-Trauma and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery (Drs Katkhouda, Mavor, Mason, Campos, and Soroushyari), and the Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery (Dr Berne), University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The Utility of Flexible Endoscopy During Advanced Laparoscopy
Onders
SURG INNOV 2003;10:43-48.
ABSTRACT
Laparoscopic Management of the Perforated Viscus
Kaiser and Katkhouda
SURG INNOV 2002;9:46-53.
ABSTRACT
Predicting Mortality and Morbidity of Patients Operated on for Perforated Peptic Ulcers
Lee et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:90-93.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|