You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 8, August 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (30)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers

Outcome and Efficacy in 30 Consecutive Patients

Namir Katkhouda, MD; Eli Mavor, MD; Rodney J. Mason, MD, PhD; Guilherme M. R. Campos, MD; Ardeshir Soroushyari, MD; Thomas V. Berne, MD

Arch Surg. 1999;134:845-850.

Hypothesis  Laparoscopic management of perforated duodenal ulcers is safe and effective.

Design  Prospective nonrandomized controlled trial.

Setting  Tertiary care academic center.

Patients and Methods  Between October 1993 and October 1997, 30 patients underwent laparoscopic Graham patch repair of perforated duodenal ulcers and 16 had an open repair.

Main Outcome Measures  Morbidity, operating time, analgesic requirements, length of hospital stay, and time to return to work.

Results  There was no difference in morbidity between the 2 groups. Operating time was longer in the laparoscopy group (106 vs 63 minutes; P=.001). Patients with shock on admission or symptoms for more than 24 hours had a higher conversion rate (P<.05). The laparoscopy group required fewer analgesics, had a shorter stay, and a quicker recovery.

Conclusions  Laparoscopic repair for perforated ulcers is safe and maintains benefits of the minimally invasive approach. Laparoscopy is not beneficial in patients with shock.


From the Division of Emergency Non-Trauma and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery (Drs Katkhouda, Mavor, Mason, Campos, and Soroushyari), and the Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery (Dr Berne), University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Utility of Flexible Endoscopy During Advanced Laparoscopy
Onders
SURG INNOV 2003;10:43-48.
ABSTRACT  

Laparoscopic Management of the Perforated Viscus
Kaiser and Katkhouda
SURG INNOV 2002;9:46-53.
ABSTRACT  

Predicting Mortality and Morbidity of Patients Operated on for Perforated Peptic Ulcers
Lee et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:90-93.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.