This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (3)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Rehabilitation Medicine  • Immunology  • Immunologic Disorders  • Law and Medicine  • Alert me on articles by topic

Amir Halevy, MD

Arch Surg. 2000;135:51-54.

The acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and human immunodeficiency virus have had a major impact on the practice of medicine in the past 2 decades. Medical professionals are once again faced with a lethal contagious disease that has been transmitted in the health care setting to both patients and providers. Because of the stigma and fear associated with the infection, civil rights legislation, such as the Americans With Disabilities Act, has been used to protect infected individuals from inappropriate discrimination based on unwarranted fears and public hysteria. Various courts, with the backing of organized medicine and the public health authorities, have made it clear that it is illegal for a physician to refuse to treat a patient based on the patient's seropositivity. Unfortunately, various courts, with the backing of the American Medical Association and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, have made it clear that infected physicians are not necessarily afforded equal protection under the civil rights statutes.

From the Department of Medicine and Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2000;135(1):109-110.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Solid-Organ Transplantation in HIV-Infected Patients
Halpern et al.
NEJM 2002;347:284-287.
FULL TEXT