You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 11, November 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Hepatobiliary Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Is the p53 Gene Mutation of Prognostic Value in Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Resection?

Kuo-Shyang Jeng, MD; I-Shyan Sheen, MD; Be-Fong Chen, MD; Ju-Yann Wu

Arch Surg. 2000;135:1329-1333.

Hypothesis  Mutant p53 gene has lost its tumor suppression function and is considered to be a very important step in hepatocellular carcinoma development. We propose that the mutant p53 gene plays a role in its invasiveness and prognosis after resection.

Design  A case-controlled study.

Setting  A referral center.

Patients  Seventy-nine consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma entered this study.

Intervention  Tissue sections of resected hepatocellular carcinoma (deparaffinized and rehydrated from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections) were incubated with antihuman p53 monoclonal antibody and immunostained. The p53 result was scored without prior knowledge of the patients' status. A 10% immunopositivity was regarded as the threshold value.

Main Outcome Measure  The immunopositive rate of p53 was 69.6% (55 of 79 patients). The clinical variables (age, sex, associated liver cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus infection, hepatitis C virus infection, serum {alpha}-fetoprotein, and Child-Pugh class); the histological variables (size, capsule, vascular permeation; grade of differentiation, and multinodularity); and postoperative course (recurrence, tumor-free interval, death, and survival period) were correlated with p53 immunopositivity.

Results  From univariate analysis, more patients with p53 positivity were male (92.7 vs 0%) (P<.001); had vascular permeation (80% vs 50%) (P = .007) (odds ratio [OR], 4.0); no complete capsule (83.6% vs 62.5%) (P = .04) (OR, 3.1); and daughter nodules (90.9% vs 70.8%) (P = .04) (OR, 4.1) than patients with negative p53 staining. From multivariate analysis, only sex and vascular permeation remained significant (P = .001 and P = .008, respectively). Although more patients with p53 positivity had tumor recurrence (78% vs 50%) (P = .01) and death (64% vs 33%) (P = .01), the Cox proportional hazards model showed that p53 overexpression had only weak correlations with tumor-free interval and survival time (P = .09 and P = .08, respectively).

Conclusions  Our results show that the biological behavior of the mutant p53 gene is strongly related to the invasiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma and may also influence the postoperative course. We suggest that the immunopositivity of the mutant p53 gene has a predictive role in the prognosis of patients with resected hepatocellular carcinoma.


From the Departments of Surgery (Dr Jeng), Pathology (Dr Chen), and Medical Research (Ms Wu), Mackay Memorial Hospital; and the Liver Research Unit, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Dr Sheen), Taipei, Taiwan.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Circulating Messenger RNA of {alpha}-Fetoprotein: A Possible Risk Factor of Recurrence After Resection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Jeng et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:1055-1060.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Mutation of p53 in Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Association with the Expression of ZBP-89
Chen et al.
Am. J. Pathol. 2003;162:1823-1829.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is the p53 Gene Mutation of Prognostic Value in Hepatocellular Carcinoma?
Ng and Fan
Arch Surg 2000;135:1476-1476.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.