You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 2, February 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Accuracy of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Peritonitis Compared With the Clinical Impression of the Surgeon

Shyr-Chyr Chen, MD; Fang-Yue Lin, MD, PhD; Yeu-Sheng Hsieh, PhD; Wei-Jao Chen, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 2000;135:170-174.

Hypothesis  Peritonitis is a well-known indication for surgery, but its preoperative cause usually is not established. We hypothesize that abdominal ultrasonography is superior to the clinical impression of the surgeon in detecting the cause of peritonitis.

Design  A prospective case series.

Setting  A major university hospital in Taiwan, Republic of China.

Patients and Methods  One hundred two patients with a diagnosis of peritonitis admitted to the Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, were included in this study. All 102 patients underwent an abdominal ultrasonographic examination; and the ultrasonographic findings of these patients were classified into 2 categories: positive findings and normal screening results. The accuracy of clinical impression in detecting the cause of peritonitis was compared with the accuracy of abdominal ultrasonography.

Results  Ultrasonography and clinical impression accurately diagnosed the peritonitis in 85 (83.3%) and 52 (51.0%) of the patients, respectively. The difference between ultrasonography and clinical impression in the diagnosis of peritonitis was significant (P<.001). Among 45 patients without a preoperative clinical diagnosis, a diagnosis was made by ultrasonography for 32 (71%) of them. There were a total of 98 patients with positive ultrasonographic findings, and 4 patients had normal screening results. Of the 98 patients with positive ultrasonographic findings undergoing surgery, all had abdominal pathological characteristics. The 4 patients with normal screening results received nonoperative treatment.

Conclusions  Ultrasonography is a more sensitive technique than clinical judgment in diagnosing peritonitis. Ultrasonography may be a useful diagnosing modality in patients with peritonitis in whom the clinical cause is unclear.


From the Departments of Emergency Medicine (Drs S.-C. Chen and Lin) and Surgery (Dr W.-J. Chen), National Taiwan University Hospital, and the Department of Agricultural Extension, National Taiwan University (Dr Hsieh), Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.


RELATED ARTICLES

Invited Critique: Accuracy of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Peritonitis Compared With the Clinical Impression of the Surgeon
Grace S. Rozycki
Arch Surg. 2000;135(2):174.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2000;135(2):241-242.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.