You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 4, April 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Experience With Endoluminal Colonic Wall Stents for the Management of Large Bowel Obstruction for Benign and Malignant Disease

Wael Z. Tamim, MD; Ali Ghellai, MD; Timothy C. Counihan, MD; Richard S. Swanson, MD; Jay M. Colby, MD; W. Brian Sweeney, MD

Arch Surg. 2000;135:434-438.

Hypothesis  To assess the applicability and efficacy of endoluminal colonic wall stents (ECWSs) in the management of large bowel obstruction (LBO).

Design  Inception cohort study.

Setting  University-based tertiary medical center.

Patients  Eleven consecutive patients with LBO in the absence of peritonitis.

Intervention  Placement of ECWS under endoscopic and fluoroscopic guidance.

Main Outcome Measures  The success rate in ECWS placement, the efficacy in decompressing the obstruction, and the patency rate of the ECWS.

Results  Successful placement of ECWSs was obtainable in 10 of 11 patients. Once placed, all 10 patients achieved immediate decompression of their LBO. Eight patients had malignant obstructions associated with distant spread of disease; 3 patients had diverticular disease. Among those with malignant obstruction, 6 patients had successful and lasting palliation without colostomy, 1 patient underwent 1-stage resection 1 month later with no evidence of obstruction, and 1 patient could not be stented so diversion was done. None of the patients with diverticular disease required diversion: 2 had complete bowel preparation followed by resection with primary anastomosis, whereas the third declined surgery. Four of the 10 patients required overlapping ECWSs to bridge the stricture. One patient required a second ECWS secondary to recurrence of obstruction after stent migration and has continued palliation of his stage 4 rectal cancer for the last 11 months. No other complications were encountered.

Conclusions  Urgent surgery with colostomy for LBO was avoided in 10 of 11 patients because of successful placement of ECWSs. We believe that endoscopic colonic stenting is safe, effective, and lasting, and should be considered as initial nonoperative management in all patients seen with LBO in the absence of peritonitis.


From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Tamim, Ghellai, Counihan, Swanson and Sweeney) and Radiology (Dr Colby), University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Metallic Stents in the Treatment of Benign Diseases of the Colon: Preliminary Experience in 10 Cases
Paul et al.
Radiology 2002;223:715-722.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.