 |
 |

Variation in the Use of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Elderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis
William S. Laycock, MD;
Andrea E. Siewers, MPH;
Christian M. Birkmeyer, BS;
David E. Wennberg, MD, MPH;
John D. Birkmeyer, MD
Arch Surg. 2000;135:457-462.
Hypothesis There is regional variation in the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis in the New England (Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut) Medicare population.
Design Population-based, cross-sectional study.
Setting Hospital service areas (HSAs), small geographic areas reflecting local hospital markets, in New England.
Patients We identified from the claims database 21 570 Medicare patients undergoing cholecystectomy between 1995 and 1997. Patients with acute calculous cholecystitis but no bile duct stones (n=6156) were then identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic codes. To reduce variation by chance, we excluded patients residing in HSAs with fewer than 26 cases, leaving 5014 patients in 77 HSAs.
Main Outcome Measures For each HSA, we assessed the rate of cholecystectomies performed laparoscopically, mortality, and hospital length of stay.
Results Overall, 53.5% of patients with acute cholecystitis underwent LC. There was wide regional variation in the rate of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, from 30.3% in the Salem, Mass, HSA to 75.5% in the Hyannis, Mass, HSA. Seventeen HSAs had rates below 40%, while 9 had rates above 70%. The average length of stay (7.6 days) was approximately 1 day shorter in HSAs with high rates of patients undergoing LC than in other HSAs. There was no correlation between regional use of laparoscopic surgery and 30-day mortality (3.1% overall).
Conclusions The likelihood of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis receiving LC depends strongly on where they live. Efforts to reduce regional variation should focus on disseminating techniques for safe LC in this high-risk population.
From the Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH (Drs Laycock and Birkmeyer and Mr Birkmeyer); Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Maine Medical Center, Portland (Ms Siewers and Dr Wennberg); Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH (Drs Birkmeyer and Wennberg); and the Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vt (Dr Birkmeyer).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Variation in the Use of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Population-Based Study
Lam et al.
Arch Surg 2005;140:1084-1088.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evidence-Based Practice in Laparoscopic Surgery: Perioperative Care
Goldfaden and Birkmeyer
SURG INNOV 2005;12:51-61.
ABSTRACT
Evidence-Based Surgery: Improving the Quality of Minimally Invasive Surgery
Birkmeyer
SURG INNOV 2004;11:269-270.
Variation in use of video assisted thoracic surgery in the United Kingdom
Sedrakyan et al.
BMJ 2004;329:1011-1012.
FULL TEXT
Provider and Hospital Characteristics Associated With Geographic Variation in the Evaluation and Management of Elderly Patients With Heart Failure
Havranek et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1186-1191.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Laparoscopic Surgery: An Excellent Approach in Elderly Patients
Weber
Arch Surg 2003;138:1083-1088.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Elderly Patients: Gold Standard for Golden Years?
Bingener et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:531-536.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|