You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 4, April 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (34)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Ileoanal Pouch Operation

Long-term Outcome With or Without Diverting Ileostomy

Peter M. Mowschenson, MD; Jonathan F. Critchlow, MD; Mark A. Peppercorn, MD

Arch Surg. 2000;135:463-466.

Hypothesis  Avoiding a diverting ileostomy does not influence the long-term overall morbidity and functional outcome of patients after ileoanal pouch operation (IAP).

Design  All patients undergoing IAP were prospectively entered into a database, and those undergoing operation from October 1, 1989, through January 31, 1996, were contacted by mail questionnaire.

Setting  Tertiary referral center.

Patients  One hundred thirty unselected sequential patients.

Interventions  The IAP was completed by a stapled method without diverting ileostomy, provided the patient agreed, and there were no other complicating factors.

Main Outcome Measures  Need for reoperation, fecal leakage, pouch frequency, ability to defer evacuation, pouchitis, and overall quality of life.

Results  Of 102 patients (78.5%) who initially underwent IAP without diverting ileostomy, 10 (9.8%) developed an anastomotic leak and required a diverting ileostomy. Additional surgery was required in 12 (9.2%) of the 130 patients for bowel obstruction and in 3 (2.3%) for pouch excision. Two patients died of unrelated causes, leaving 125 functioning pouches (96.2%). Questionnaires were completed in 111 (88.8%) of the 125; 75 patients (67.6%) reported perfect continence for gas and stool, 10 patients (9.0%), regular nighttime leakage, and 24 patients (21.6%), occasional fecal leakage. Pouch evacuation frequency (±SD) per 24 hours was 7.8 ± 2.4 (range, 4-12), and 95.5% of patients could defer pouch evacuation. Of the 111 patients, 42.3% reported pouchitis, with 7.2% receiving long-term antibiotic therapy. Of the patients, 74.8% reported total satisfaction, and 84.7% regarded themselves as being in perfect health.

Conclusion  Long-term outcome after IAP remains favorable with or without diverting ileostomy.


From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparison of Outcomes After Restorative Proctocolectomy With or Without Defunctioning Ileostomy
Weston-Petrides et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:406-412.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist reduces an ongoing ileal pouch inflammation and the response to a subsequent inflammatory stimulus
Stucchi et al.
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2003;285:G1259-G1267.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.