This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (27)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Surgery, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

Lisa M. Colletti, MD; Michael W. Mulholland, MD, PhD; Seema S. Sonnad, PhD

Arch Surg. 2000;135:972-977.

Hypothesis  We conducted this study to determine whether concerns expressed by male and female surgeons at 1 academic center are generally reflective of broader concerns for academic surgery and academic medicine. We reviewed published studies concerning women in academic surgery within the context of reporting the results of a survey of both male and female surgeons at 1 academic center.

Data Sources  We developed a survey that included demographic information, work experience, and social issues. The survey was distributed to the entire faculty. For key questions, we compared answers between male and female faculty. Additional data came from the published literature.

Study Selection  We reviewed all available studies identified by a MEDLINE search with key words women and academic and medicine or physician. Included studies contained either data collection or editorial comment concerning women in academic medicine.

Data Extraction  Data and opinions from all included studies paralleling survey questions were extracted from each article.

Data Synthesis  Male and female faculty members reported different experiences and perceptions, specifically relating to relationships between family and professional life and perceptions of subtle sex-related biases. Both men and women reported insufficient mentoring and difficulties in balancing personal and professional responsibilities.

Conclusions  Attitudes, behaviors, and traditions surrounding how we structure work and evaluate participation in academic surgery are more difficult to change than just addressing obvious inequities in support for female surgeons. However, attempting the deeper changes is worthwhile, because addressing obstacles faced by female faculty, many of which also affect men, will allow progress toward environments that attract and retain the best physicians, regardless of sex.

From the General Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Gender and the Surgical Workforce
Quinlan
Arch Surg 2007;142:321-328.
FULL TEXT  

Mentoring Surgeons for the 21st Century
Singletary
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2005;12:848-860.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Women Authors of Surgical Research
Kurichi et al.
Arch Surg 2005;140:1074-1077.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Professional Satisfaction of Women in Surgery: Results of a National Study
End et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:1208-1214.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Are the Primary Concerns of Recently Graduated Surgeons and How Do They Differ From Those of the Residency Training Years?
Gabram et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:1109-1114.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT