Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity
Technique and Preliminary Results of Our First 400 Patients
Kelvin D. Higa, MD;
Keith B. Boone, MD;
Tienchin Ho, MD;
Orland G. Davies, MD
Arch Surg. 2000;135:1029-1033.
Hypothesis A technique of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be developed that is safe, effective, and practical in the community setting.
Design A case series of 400 morbidly obese and superobese individuals who underwent the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass over a 22-month period.
Setting Community private practice in Fresno, Calif.
Patients A consecutive sample of 400 patients (70 males and 330 females) who met National Institutes of Health criteria for recommendation of a bariatric procedure. Only patients who had a previous gastric or bariatric procedure were excluded from this sample.
Intervention Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a hand-sewn gastrojejunal anastomosis.
Main Outcome Measures Weight loss, complications, length of hospital stay, successful completion of the operation, and operative times were measured.
Results Open conversion was required in 12 patients (6 males and 6 females) and a secondary operation for incomplete division of the stomach was required in 2 patients early in the case series. Alternative exposure and fixation techniques greatly reduced these occurrences. There were 6 staple-line failures owing to a change in the manufacture of the instrument. There were no leaks at the gastrojejunal anastomosis, but 21 patients required endoscopic balloon dilation for significant stenosis. The average hospital stay was 1.6 days for the patients who underwent laparoscopy and 2.7 days for patients requiring open conversion. Average excessive weight loss was 69% at 12 months. Operative times are between 60 and 90 minutes. Other complications are described.
Conclusion The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass can be safely and effectively performed in the community setting using advanced laparoscopic techniques.
From the Department of Surgery, St Agnes Medical Center, Fresno, Calif The authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interests in the products and companies described in this article.
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2000;135(9):1121-1122.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Detection of strictures on upper gastrointestinal tract radiographic examinations after laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass surgery: importance of projection.
Jha et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006;186:1090-1093.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Small-Bowel Complications of Major Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery
Sandrasegaran et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005;185:671-681.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Pharmacologic and Surgical Management of Obesity in Primary Care: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians
Snow et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:525-531.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Meta-Analysis: Surgical Treatment of Obesity
Maggard et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:547-559.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Effects of Obesity Surgery on the Metabolic Syndrome
Lee et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:1088-1092.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Gastrojejunostomy in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
Himpens
SURG INNOV 2004;11:171-177.
ABSTRACT
The Neurological Complications of Bariatric Surgery
Berger
Arch Neurol 2004;61:1185-1189.
FULL TEXT
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in the "Megaobese"
Kreitz and Rovito
Arch Surg 2003;138:707-709.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Predictors of Complication and Suboptimal Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Series of 188 Patients
Perugini et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:541-546.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Gastrojejunostomy During Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: Analysis of 3 Techniques
Gonzalez et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:181-184.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Gastrointestinal Complications of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery in Patients Who Are Morbidly Obese: Findings on Radiography and CT
Blachar and Federle
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002;179:1437-1442.
FULL TEXT
Laparoscopic Gastric Banding in Older Patients
Nehoda et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:1171-1176.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
