You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 9, September 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Primary Duodenal Adenocarcinoma

A 40-Year Experience

Nova M. Ryder, MD; Clifford Y. Ko, MD; Oscar J. Hines, MD; Beat Gloor, MD; Howard A. Reber, MD

Arch Surg. 2000;135:1070-1074.

Hypothesis  In patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma, certain pathologic features of the tumor will have prognostic significance.

Design  Retrospective case series.

Patients  Forty-nine patients diagnosed with duodenal adenocarcinoma between 1957 and 1998.

Results  The tumors of 31 (63%) of the 49 patients underwent resection, 18 (37%) had surgical palliation or underwent biopsy. Mean (± SEM) survival for all patients was 49 ± 9 months. The patients whose tumors were resected had longer survival than those who underwent palliation (mean ± SEM, 66 ± 13 months vs 18 ± 6 months, P = .02). Multivariate analysis revealed large tumor size (P = .01), transmural invasion (P = .004), and moderate to poor tumor grade (P = .03) were negatively correlated with survival. Lymph node status did not influence survival.

Conclusions  Our 40-year experience with duodenal adenocarcinoma demonstrates that large tumor size, advanced histological grade, and transmural invasion are associated with decreased survival. These results underscore the importance of early diagnosis, and suggest the presence of nodal spread is not a contraindication to resection.


From the Division of General Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Utility of a Prognostic Nomogram Designed for Gastric Cancer in Predicting Outcome of Patients with R0 Resected Duodenal Adenocarcinoma.
Gold et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:3159-3167.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Editorial: Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: Is Total Lymph Node Sampling Predictive of Outcome?
Gibbs
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2004;11:354-355.
FULL TEXT  

Adenocarcinoma of the Duodenum: Importance of Accurate Lymph Node Staging and Similarity in Outcome to Gastric Cancer
Sarela et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2004;11:380-386.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adenocarcinoma of the Third and Fourth Portions of the Duodenum: Results of Surgical Treatment
Tocchi et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:80-85.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.