You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 136 No. 1, January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Risk Stratification in Emergency Surgical Patients

Is the APACHE II Score a Reliable Marker of Physiological Impairment?

Thomas Koperna, MD, PhD; Dagmar Semmler, MD; Friedrich Marian, MD

Arch Surg. 2001;136:55-59.

Hypotheses  The APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) score used as an intensive care unit (ICU) admission score in emergency surgical patients is not independent of the effects of treatment and might lead to considerable bias in the comparability of defined groups of patients and in the evaluation of treatment policies. Postoperative monitoring with the APACHE II score is clinically irrelevant.

Design  Inception cohort study.

Setting  Secondary referral center.

Patients  Eighty-five consecutive emergency surgical patients admitted to the surgical ICU in 1999. The APACHE II score was calculated before surgery; after admission to the ICU; and on postoperative days 3, 7, and 10.

Main Outcome Measures  APACHE II scores and predicted and observed mortality rates.

Results  The mean ± SD APACHE II score of 24.2 ± 8.3 at admission to the ICU was approximately 36% greater than the initial APACHE II score of 17.8 ± 7.7, a difference that was highly statistically significant (P<.001). The overall mortality of 32% favorably corresponds with the predicted mortality of 34% according to the initial APACHE II score. However, the predicted mortality of 50% according to the APACHE II score at admission to the ICU was significantly different from the observed mortality rate (P = .02). In 40 long-term patients (>=10 days in the ICU), the difference between the APACHE II scores of survivors and patients who died was statistically significant on day 10 (P = .04).

Conclusions  For risk stratification in emergency surgical patients, it is essential to measure the APACHE II score before surgical treatment. Longitudinal APACHE II scoring reveals continuous improvement of the score in surviving patients but has no therapeutic relevance in the individual patient.


From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Koperna and Semmler) and Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (Dr Marian), Hospital Mistelbach, Mistelbach, Austria.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

APACHE II Scoring: Is It Time for a Moratorium?
Britt
Arch Surg 2001;136:353-353.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.