You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 136 No. 1, January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Predicting Mortality and Morbidity of Patients Operated on for Perforated Peptic Ulcers

Fung Yee Janet Lee, MD; Ka Lau Leung, FRCS(Edin); Bo San Paul Lai, MD; Simon Siu Man Ng, FRCS(Edin); Simon Dexter, FRCS(Lond); Wan Yee Lau, MD

Arch Surg. 2001;136:90-93.

Hypothesis  Since the early 1990s, the laparoscopic technique has been increasingly used for the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. It is important to validate a risk scoring system that can stratify patients into various risk groups before comparing the treatment outcome of laparoscopic repair against that of conventional open surgery. The scoring system should be able to predict the likelihood of mortality and morbidity. Boey score and APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) score may be of use in patient stratification.

Design  Retrospective review of relevant case notes by one reviewer.

Setting  A teaching hospital treating 0.5 million to 1 million patients during the study period.

Patients  Patients operated on for perforated peptic ulcer between January 1989 and December 1998. Patients treated conservatively were excluded.

Main Outcome Measures  Mortality and postoperative complications (morbidity).

Results  A total of 436 patients (365 male and 71 female) with a mean ± SD age of 51.5 ± 18.3 years (range, 14-92 years) were studied. Duodenal perforation accounted for 344 (78.9%) of 436 cases. The mortality rate was 7.8% (34/436), and 89 patients had postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only the APACHE II score predicted both mortality and morbidity. Although the Boey score predicted mortality, it failed to predict morbidity. However, the Boey score predicted the chance of conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic repair.

Conclusions  The APACHE II score may be a useful tool for stratifying patients into various risk groups, and the Boey score might select appropriate patients for laparoscopic repair.


From the Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.


RELATED ARTICLES

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2001;136(1):120-121.
FULL TEXT  

Predicting Mortality and Morbidity of Patients Operated on for Perforated Peptic Ulcers—Invited Critique
Moshe Schein and Leslie Wise
Arch Surg. 2001;136(1):93.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Predicting Mortality and Morbidity of Patients Operated on for Perforated Peptic Ulcers—Invited Response
Wan Yee Lau
Arch Surg. 2001;136(1):94.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Applications of Fibrin Sealant in Surgery
Lee and Jones
SURG INNOV 2005;12:203-213.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.