You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 136 No. 11, November 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (50)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Common Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and the Use of Intraoperative Cholangiography

Adverse Outcome or Preventable Error?

David R. Flum, MD; Thomas Koepsell, MD; Patrick Heagerty, PhD; Mika Sinanan, MD; E. Patchen Dellinger, MD

Arch Surg. 2001;136:1287-1292.

Background  Common bile duct (CBD) injury is a serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Predictors of this adverse outcome have not been well documented.

Hypothesis  Surgeon experience and the use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) are associated with a decreased rate of major CBD injury during LC.

Design  A retrospective population-based cohort study.

Setting  Washington State hospital discharge database reports from 1991 through 1998.

Patients  Discharge reports were searched for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedure codes consistent with LC and then evaluated for procedure codes for CBD repair and reconstruction within 90 days of LC.

Main Outcome Measure  The rate of CBD injury in patients undergoing LC based on the surgeon's experience and IOC use.

Results  In all, 30 630 LCs and 76 major CBD injuries (2.5/1000 operations) were identified in this analysis. There were no significant differences between injured and noninjured patients in demographics, disease, payer status, or hospital variables. A CBD injury occurred in 3.2 of 1000 LCs in the early case order of surgeons compared with 1.7 per 1000 at later points (P = .01) (relative risk, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-2.88). The rate of injury in LCs performed without IOC was 3.3 per 1000 compared with 2.0 per 1000 in LCs with IOC (P = .02) (relative risk, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.6). Surgeon's experience and IOC use were independent predictors of injury.

Conclusions  The rate of CBD injury is significantly lower when IOC is used. This effect is magnified during the early experience of surgeons. Systematic use of IOC may significantly reduce the rate of CBD injury.


From the Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle.


RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2001;136(11):1229.
FULL TEXT  

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2001;136(11):1329-1330.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Risk Factors for Bile Duct Injury During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Case-Control Study
Kholdebarin et al.
SURG INNOV 2008;15:114-119.
ABSTRACT  

Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury: A Population-Based Study of 152 776 Cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry
Waage and Nilsson
Arch Surg 2006;141:1207-1213.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intraoperative Cholangiography and Risk of Common Bile Duct Injury--Reply
Flum et al.
JAMA 2003;290:459-460.
FULL TEXT  

Intraoperative Cholangiography and Risk of Common Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy
Flum et al.
JAMA 2003;289:1639-1644.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.