You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 136 No. 12, December 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Results of a Pilot Trial Comparing Prolonged Intravenous Antibiotics With Sequential Intravenous/Oral Antibiotics for Children With Perforated Appendicitis

Henry E. Rice, MD; Rebecca L. Brown, MD; Gerald Gollin, MD; Michael G. Caty, MD; James Gilbert, MD; Michael A. Skinner, MD; Philip L. Glick, MD; Richard G. Azizkhan, MD

Arch Surg. 2001;136:1391-1395.

Hypothesis  For children with perforated appendicitis, the use of a prolonged course of intravenous (IV) antibiotics is equivalent to a short course of IV antibiotics followed by sequential conversion to oral (PO) antibiotics.

Design  Prospective, randomized, clinical trial.

Setting  Multicenter study in tertiary children's hospitals.

Patients  Children (aged 5-18 years) with perforated appendicitis found at laparotomy.

Intervention  Children were randomized after appendectomy either to a 10-day course of a combination of IV ampicillin, gentamicin sulfate, and clindamycin (n = 10); or to a short course of a combination of IV ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin, followed by conversion to a combination of PO amoxicillin and clavulanate potassium plus metronidazole (n = 16).

Main Outcome Measures  The primary outcome measure was clinical success, which was rated as complete, partial, or failure. Secondary outcome measures included return of oral intake, duration of fever, return of normal white blood cell count, and patient charges. Treatment equivalence was determined using confidence interval analysis.

Results  We found treatment equivalence between the IV and IV/PO groups, with 6 (60%) complete and 4 (40%) partial successes for the 10 patients in the IV group and 15 (94%) complete and 1 (6%) partial successes for the 16 patients in the IV/PO group (P<=.05). There was no difference in return of oral intake, duration of fever, or return of normal white blood cell count between the groups. Conversion to oral therapy results in savings of approximately $1500 per case.

Conclusion  There is treatment equivalence between prolonged IV therapy and IV therapy followed by conversion to oral antibiotic therapy in children with perforated appendicitis.


From the Division of Pediatric Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Drs Rice and Skinner); the Divisions of Pediatric Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (Drs Brown and Azizkhan), and Loma Linda University Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, Calif (Dr Gollin); the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital of Buffalo and the State University of New York at Buffalo (Drs Caty and Glick); and the Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC (Dr Gilbert).


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2001;136(12):1443-1444.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.