You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 136 No. 3, March 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Thoracolumbar Immobilization for Trauma Patients With Torso Gunshot Wounds

Is It Necessary?

Edward E. Cornwell III, MD; David C. Chang, MPH; James P. Bonar, MD; Kurtis A. Campbell, MD; Judy Phillips, RN; Pamela Lipsett, MD; Thomas Scalea, MD; Robert Bass, MD

Arch Surg. 2001;136:324-327.

Background  Previous studies have suggested that patients transported by emergency medical services (EMS) following major trauma had a longer injury-to-treatment interval and a higher mortality rate than their non-EMS–transported counterparts.

Hypothesis  There is little actual benefit of thoracolumbar immobilization for patients with torso gunshot wounds (GSW).

Design  Retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data from the Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Service Systems State Trauma Registry from July 1, 1995, through June 30, 1998.

Settings  All designated trauma centers in Maryland.

Patients  All patients with torso GSW.

Main Outcome Measures  (1) A patient was considered to have benefited from immobilization if he or she had less than complete neurologic deficits in the presence of an unstable vertebral column, as shown by the need for operative stabilization of the vertebral column; (2) mortality.

Results  There were 1000 patients with torso GSW. Among them, 141 patients (14.1%) had vertebral column and/or spinal cord injuries. Two patients (0.2%) (95% confidence interval, -0.077% to 0.48%) required operative vertebral column stabilization, while 6 others required other spinal operations for decompression and/or foreign body removal. The presence of vertebral column injury was actually associated with lower mortality (7.1% vs 14.8%, P<.02).

Conclusions  This study suggests that thoracolumbar immobilization is almost never beneficial in patients with torso GSW, and that a higher mortality rate existed among those GSW patients without vertebral column injury vs those with such injuries. The role of formal thoracolumbar immobilization for patients with torso GSW should be reexamined.


From the Department of Surgery, Adult Trauma Service, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions (Drs Cornwell, Bonar, Campbell, and Lipsett and Ms Phillips); Department of Health Policy and Management, The Johns Hopkins School of Public Health (Mr Chang); University of Maryland School of Medicine (Dr Scalea); and Maryland Institute for Emergency Medical Service Systems (Dr Bass), Baltimore, Md.


RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2001;136(3):259.
FULL TEXT  

Thoracolumbar Immobilization for Trauma Patients With Torso Gunshot Wounds—Invited Critique
Richard L. Gamelli
Arch Surg. 2001;136(3):327.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2001;136(3):361.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.