 |
|
Is Unplanned Return to the Operating Room a Useful Quality Indicator in General Surgery?
John D. Birkmeyer, MD;
Leigh S. Hamby, MD;
Christian M. Birkmeyer, BS;
Maureen V. Decker, RN;
Nancy M. Karon, RN;
Richard W. Dow, MD
Arch Surg. 2001;136:405-411.
Hypothesis To test our hypothesis that unplanned return to the operating room (OR) is a useful quality indicator, we examined how often and for what reasons patients go back to the OR in a broad-based general surgery practice.
Design and Setting Prospective cohort study at a rural tertiary care center.
Patients Consecutive series of 3044 patients undergoing general surgery procedures in the OR between September 1, 1998, and March 31, 2000. Information about all postoperative adverse events occurring before discharge or within 30 days (whichever was longer) was collected prospectively. Unplanned return to the OR was defined as any secondary procedure required for a complication resulting directly or indirectly from the index operation.
Main Outcome Measures Unplanned return to the OR, mortality, and hospital charges.
Results Overall, 107 (3.5%) had an unplanned return to the OR. A relatively small number of inpatient procedures accounted for a disproportionate share of unplanned reoperations, including colon resection (18% of total reoperations), renal transplant (9%), gastric bypass (6%), and pancreatic resection (6%). As expected, hospital charges were markedly higher for patients with unplanned returns to the OR. Reoperation was also associated with higher mortality rates; statistically significant increases were noted for pancreatic resection (33% vs 3.7%; P = .04), esophagogastrectomy (100% vs 4.2%; P = .002), and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (50% vs 0%; P = .01). Overall, 91 reoperations (85%) were for complications occurring at the original surgical site, including those related to an anastomosis (n = 16), surgical wound (n = 21), infection (n = 16), bleeding (n = 12), and other (n = 26).
Conclusions Unplanned returns to the OR occur across a broad spectrum of general surgical procedures and carry significant implications. Because they most often reflect problems related to the procedure itself, reoperation rates may be useful for monitoring quality across hospitals and for identifying opportunities for quality improvement locally.
From the Department of Surgery (Drs Birkmeyer and Dow, Mr Birkmeyer, and Mss Decker and Karon), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; the VA Outcomes Group (Dr J. D. Birkmeyer) and Quality Scholars Program (Dr Hamby), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vt; and the Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences (Dr J. D. Birkmeyer), Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH.
RELATED ARTICLES
This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2001;136(4):375.
FULL TEXT
Is Unplanned Return to the Operating Room a Useful Quality Indicator in General Surgery?—Invited Critique
Gerald W. Peskin
Arch Surg. 2001;136(4):411.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2001;136(4):481-482.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
The Incidence of Unplanned Returns to the Operating Room After Peripheral Arterial Bypass Surgery and Its Value as Indicator of Quality of Care
Ploeg et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2008;42:19-24.
ABSTRACT
Can the Incidence of Unplanned Reoperations Be Used as an Indicator of Quality of Care in Surgery?
Kroon et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2007;22:198-202.
ABSTRACT
Surgeon and Hospital Characteristics as Predictors of Major Adverse Outcomes Following Colon Cancer Surgery: Understanding the Volume-Outcome Relationship
Billingsley et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:23-31.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The Validity of Unplanned Returns to the Operating Room as an Indicator of Quality of Hospital Care
Ladner et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:493-493.
FULL TEXT
Quality Measurement of Outcome in General Surgery Revisited: Commentary and Proposal
Shuhaiber
Arch Surg 2002;137:52-54.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
