You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 136 No. 4, April 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (81)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Liver Transplantation
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Live Donor Adult Liver Transplantation Using Right Lobe Grafts

Donor Evaluation and Surgical Outcome

Elizabeth A. Pomfret, MD,PhD; James J. Pomposelli, MD,PhD; W. David Lewis, MD; Fredric D. Gordon, MD; David L. Burns, MD; Anne Lally, MD; Vassilios Raptopoulos, MD; Roger L. Jenkins, MD

Arch Surg. 2001;136:425-433.

Hypothesis  Live donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT) is a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease.

Design  Case-control study.

Setting  Hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation unit.

Patients  From December 10, 1998, through April 10, 2000, a single team performed 15 LDALT procedures with 2 simultaneous living donor kidney transplants. During this period, 66 potential donors were screened and evaluated.

Interventions  Potential donors were evaluated with 3-dimensional helical computed tomographic scan, including volume renderings for hepatic lobar volume, vascular anatomy, virtual resection planes, and morphologic features. Suitable donors undergo complete medical and psychiatric evaluation and preoperative arteriography.

Main Outcome Measures  Donor demographics, evaluation data, operative data, hospital length of stay, and morbidity.

Results  A total of 38 men (58%) and 28 women (42%) were evaluated with 15 donors participating in LDALT. Two additional donors provided kidney grafts for simultaneous transplantation at the time of LDALT. Thirty-two donors (48%) were rejected for either donor or recipient reasons, and 10 patients (15%) elected not to participate after initial screening. Three-dimensional volume renderings by helical computed tomographic scan predicted right lobe liver volume within 92% of actual graft volume. Donor morbidity, including all complications, was 67% with no mortality. Residual liver regenerated to approximately 70% of initial volume within 1 week and 80% within 1 month after surgery.

Conclusions  Donor evaluation is an important component of LDALT. Significant donor morbidity is encountered even with careful selection. To minimize donor morbidity, groups considering initiating living donor programs should have expertise in hepatic resection and vena cava preservation using the "piggyback" technique during liver transplantation.


From the Departments of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery (Drs Pomfret, Pomposelli, Lewis, Gordon, Lally, and Jenkins) and Medicine (Dr Burns), Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Mass; and Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass (Dr Raptopoulos).


RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2001;136(4):375.
FULL TEXT  

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2001;136(4):481-482.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Complications in Living Liver Donors After Partial Liver Procurement: An Illustrative Radiologic Review
Kwon et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;189:W338-W343.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Living Liver Donors with an All-inclusive 3D Multi-Detector Row CT Protocol
Schroeder et al.
Radiology 2006;238:900-910.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multidetector CT in the Evaluation of Potential Living Donors for Liver Transplantation
Alonso-Torres et al.
RadioGraphics 2005;25:1017-1030.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preoperative Hepatic Vascular Evaluation with CT and MR Angiography: Implications for Surgery
Sahani et al.
RadioGraphics 2004;24:1367-1380.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Complications in Donors and Interventional Management
Lee et al.
Radiology 2004;230:443-449.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multi-Detector Row CT of Relevant Vascular Anatomy of the Surgical Plane in Split-Liver Transplantation
Guiney et al.
Radiology 2003;229:401-407.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pathologic Analysis of Right-Lobe Graft Failure in Adult-to-Adult Live Donor Liver Transplantation
Pantanowitz et al.
INT J SURG PATHOL 2003;11:283-294.
ABSTRACT  

Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Adults: Vascular Variants Important in Surgical Planning for Donors and Recipients
Erbay et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003;181:109-114.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Characteristics of Liver Grafts in Living-Donor Adult Liver Transplantation: Comparison Between Right- and Left-Lobe Grafts
Shimada et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:1174-1179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Transplantation of the Right Hepatic Lobe
Dixon et al.
NEJM 2002;347:615-618.
FULL TEXT  

Potential Living Liver Donors: Evaluation with an All-in-One Protocol with Multi-Detector Row CT
Schroeder et al.
Radiology 2002;224:586-591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.