This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (42)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Ultrasonography  • Gastrointestinal Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

When Are They Indicated?

Erik B. Wilson, MD; J. Christopher Cole, MD; Michael L. Nipper, MD; Donald R. Cooney, MD; Randall W. Smith, MD

Arch Surg. 2001;136:670-675.

Hypothesis  Relative merits and indications exist for ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Design  Prospective study.

Setting  General community and tertiary care hospital.

Methods  Ninety-nine patients (50 males and 49 females) were studied. Following consent, the initial disposition was recorded, designating the patient for operation, observation, or discharge from the hospital. Each patient was studied by CT and US. Studies were independently evaluated by 2 radiologists, and the results were designated as positive, negative, or equivocal. The surgeon reevaluated patients before and after learning the results of US and CT, recording whether the CT scan, US, or reexamination influenced the final disposition.

Results  Fifty patients had appendicitis; 6 appendixes were perforated. The initial clinical impression called for 44 operations, 49 observations, and 6 discharges. Thirty-four patients had their treatment plan changed from the initial disposition. Ultrasonography did not affect the initial impression. In contrast, 18 patients were rediagnosed solely on CT scan findings. Seven patients were rediagnosed by reexamination. Of 44 patients initially designated for operation, the CT scan and reexamination spared 6 females from surgery; the negative appendectomy rate potentially decreased from 50% to 17% (P = .03). The CT scan, US, or reexamination failed to spare 2 males from exploration with negative results. Of the 49 patients initially designated for observation, 23 were rediagnosed after reevaluation, 13 were discharged from the hospital, and 10 underwent expedient operation. One patient was spared from inappropriate discharge from the hospital. The reliability of the CT scan was good, with high sensitivities and specificities. Equivocal scan results lowered the diagnostic value.

Conclusions  Selective use of a CT scan with a second examination can improve the diagnostic accuracy and management of suspected cases of appendicitis by (a) reducing the negative appendectomy rate in females, (b) moving patients from observation to earlier operation or discharge from the hospital, and (c) preventing inappropriate discharge of patients with appendicitis.

From the Departments of Surgery and Radiology, Scott & White Memorial Hospital and Clinic, and Scott, Sherwood and Brindley Foundation, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, College of Medicine, Temple.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2001;136(6):618.
FULL TEXT  

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2001;136(6):712-713.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Imaging of patients with clinically suspected appendicitis in the Netherlands: conclusions of a survey
COBBEN et al.
Br. J. Radiol. 2009;82:482-485.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Therapeutic Impact of CT of the Appendix in a Community Hospital Emergency Department
Nathan et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;191:1102-1106.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute Appendicitis: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of CT and Graded Compression US Related to Prevalence of Disease
van Randen et al.
Radiology 2008;249:97-106.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of helical computed tomography in clinically evident appendicitis
Kim et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2008;25:477-481.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Accuracy of Color Doppler Sonography and MDCT Compared with Surgery and Clinical Follow-Up
Gaitini et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;190:1300-1306.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Appendectomy: Negative Appendectomy No Longer Ignored
Fujita and Yanaga
Arch Surg 2007;142:1023-1025.
FULL TEXT  

Imaging investigation of acute right iliac fossa pain
Anderson and Bungay
Imaging 2006;18:257-267.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Utility and Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography in Detecting Appendicitis in a Community Hospital
Chan et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005;184:1809-1812.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Systematic Review: Computed Tomography and Ultrasonography To Detect Acute Appendicitis in Adults and Adolescents
Terasawa et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2004;141:537-546.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of CT and Sonography in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Blinded Prospective Study
Poortman et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003;181:1355-1359.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Suspected Appendicitis
Paulson et al.
NEJM 2003;348:236-242.
FULL TEXT  

The Clinical and Economic Correlates of Misdiagnosed Appendicitis: Nationwide Analysis
Flum and Koepsell
Arch Surg 2002;137:799-804.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT