This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (34)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Surgery, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Finn Gottrup, MD,DMSc; Per Holstein, MD,DMSc; Bo Jørgensen, MD; Michael Lohmann, MD; Tonny Karlsmar, MD,DMSc

Arch Surg. 2001;136:765-772.

Hypothesis  An independent, multidisciplinary wound healing center in an accepted national expert function of wound healing is the optimal way to improve prophylaxis and treatment of patients with problem wounds.

Design  A clinical perspective analysis.

Setting  An independent, multidisciplinary wound healing center focusing on all types of problem wounds, organized as a university hospital department, and integrated in an expert function in the national health care organization of Denmark.

Patients and Methods  Patients with all types of problem wounds referred to and treated in the center during the first years of its existence provided a model for a new multidisciplinary structure for treatment of wound patients in the health care system.

Results  During the first 3 years of the fully functioning wound healing center, a total of 23 802 patient consultations were performed in the outpatient clinic, and 1014 patients with problem wounds were hospitalized in the inpatient ward. The surgical concept of the center has resulted in improved healing rates in patients with leg ulcers and decreased rates of major amputations. The outpatient function has resulted in a decrease in the number of patients transported in beds to the center. This structure provides better opportunities for basic and clinical research as well as for establishing expert education for all types of health care personnel. The center's structure has been the background for establishing an expert function in wound healing, allowing the wound healing area area to be fully integrated in the Danish National Health Care System. Overall, the concept and structure of the center have enhanced the knowledge and understanding of wound problems and increased the status of wound healing and patient care.

Conclusions  Establishing multidisciplinary centers integrated into an accepted national expert function of wound healing is an optimal way to improve the clinical outcome of prophylaxis and treatment of all types of problem wounds. This model, with minor adjustments, may be applicable for both industrialized and developing countries.

From the Copenhagen Wound Healing Center, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2001;136(7):731.
FULL TEXT  

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2001;136(7):846-847.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Documentation of 7051 Chronic Wounds Using a New Computerized System Within a Network of Wound Care Centers
Coerper et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:251-258.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decrease of Collagen Deposition in Wound Repair in Type 1 Diabetes Independent of Glycemic Control
Black et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:34-40.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Ultrasound in Lower Extremity Wound Management
Collins and Mani
INT J LOW EXTREM WOUNDS 2002;1:229-235.
ABSTRACT  

The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds: Why Another?
Mani
INT J LOW EXTREM WOUNDS 2002;1:3-3.