You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 136 No. 8, August 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Enteral vs Parenteral Nutrition After Major Abdominal Surgery

An Even Match

Fabio Pacelli, MD; Maurizio Bossola, MD; Valerio Papa, MD; Marina Malerba, MD; Cristina Modesti, MD; Antonio Sgadari, MD; Rocco Bellantone, MD; Giovanni Battista Doglietto, MD; Cristina Modesti, MD; for the EN-TPN Study Group

Arch Surg. 2001;136:933-936.

Hypothesis  Immediate enteral feeding following major abdominal surgery reduces postoperative complications and mortality when compared with parenteral nutrition.

Design  A prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Setting  A university hospital department of digestive surgery.

Patients and Interventions  Two hundred forty-one malnourished patients undergoing major elective abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to receive, after surgery, either enteral (enteral nutrition group: 119 patients) or parenteral nutrition (total parenteral nutrition group: 122 patients). The patients were monitored for postoperative complications and mortality.

Results  The rate of major postoperative complications was similar in the enteral and parenteral groups (enteral nutrition group: 37.8%; total parenteral nutrition group: 39.3%; P was not significant), as were the overall postoperative mortality rates (5.9% and 2.5%, respectively; P was not significant).

Conclusion  The present study failed to demonstrate that enteral feeding following major abdominal surgery reduces postoperative complications and mortality when compared with parenteral nutrition.


From the Departments of Surgical Sciences (Drs Pacelli, Bossola, Papa, Malerba, Bellantone, and Doglietto), Anesthesiology (Dr Modesti), and Internal Medicine and Geriatrics (Dr Sgadari), Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Fistuloclysis: Case Report and Literature Review
Ham et al.
Nutr Clin Pract 2007;22:553-557.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 68-Year-Old Man With COPD Contemplating Colon Cancer Surgery
Smetana
JAMA 2007;297:2121-2130.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications after noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic review for the American College of Physicians.
Lawrence et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:596-608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding Clinical Issues in Postoperative Nutrition After Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Zgodzinski et al.
Nutr Clin Pract 2005;20:654-661.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nutrition support for patients in the intensive care unit
Griffiths and Bongers
Postgrad. Med. J. 2005;81:629-636.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nasojejunal Tube Placement After Total Gastrectomy: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial
Doglietto et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:1309-1313.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.