 |
 |

Multivariate Analysis of Clinicopathologic Parameters for the Insular Subtype of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma
Andreas Machens, MD;
Raoul Hinze, MD;
Christine Lautenschläger, PhD;
Henning Dralle, MD
Arch Surg. 2001;136:941-944.
Hypothesis Insular carcinoma represents a more aggressive subtype of differentiated thyroid cancer on multivariate analysis after controlling for various clinicopathologic parameters.
Design Retrospective analysis.
Setting Tertiary referral center at a university hospital.
Patients One hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients having a histological diagnosis of the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma or follicular thyroid carcinoma.
Main Outcome Measure A logistic regression model was used to examine the relationship between various clinicopathologic parameters and the insular subtype.
Results The insular subtype involved 14 of 127 tumors. Unlike extrathyroidal extension and nodal metastasis, primary tumor diameter (>40 mm vs 40 mm; P = .008) and distant metastasis (P = .003) correlated with the insular subtype. Both parameters were interrelated since tumors greater than 40 mm displayed distant metastasis more often (30% vs 8%; P = .008) than tumors measuring 40 mm or less.
Conclusions These findings suggest that an unidentified somatic event may induce an accelerated proliferation of the transformed thyrocytes, which may ultimately result in enhanced rates of distant metastasis with increasing tumor volume.
From the Departments of General Surgery (Drs Machens and Dralle), Pathology (Dr Hinze), and Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics, and Informatics (Dr Lautenschläger), Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Multivariate Analysis of Clinicopathologic Parameters for the Insular Subtype of Differentiated Thyroid CarcinomaInvited Critique
Peter J. Fabri
Arch Surg. 2001;136(8):944.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2001;136(8):969-970.
FULL TEXT
|