This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (33)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Surgery  • Surgical Interventions  • Vascular Surgery  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Retrospective Study on Early and Late Complications

Isidoro Di Carlo, MD; Stefano Cordio, MD; Gaetano La Greca, MD; Giuseppe Privitera, MD; Domenico Russello, MD; Stefano Puleo, MD; Ferdinando Latteri, MD

Arch Surg. 2001;136:1050-1053.

Background  The techniques used for the implantation of totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) are the percutaneous approach and surgical cutdown; however, the choice is still controversial.

Hypothesis  The surgical cutdown approach may be beneficial to reduce the rate of complications.

Design  Retrospective review.

Setting  A university hospital and a tertiary referral center.

Patients  Patients undergoing a TIVAD implant at the First Surgical Clinic of the University of Catania in Catania, Italy, between January 1995 and December 1999, were considered for the study. All of the devices were implanted in an operating room under fluoroscopic control. The vein of choice was the cephalic vein. When the cephalic vein was not suitable for implantation, the external jugular vein or the axillary vein and its branches were used. The percutaneous approach to the subclavian vein or internal jugular vein was considered a last resort to implant a catheter.

Results  During the study period, 346 TIVADs were implanted in 344 patients. The procedure was performed with local anesthesia in 341 cases (98.5%), and only 2 patients (0.6%) required sedation for psychological reasons. Three patients (0.9%) had their TIVAD placed during a laparotomy. In 326 patients (94.2%), the devices were implanted in the cephalic vein. In the remaining cases, other veins were used with surgical cutdown. The mean time for the procedure was 15 minutes. Percutaneous access was never used, and no early mechanical complications were recorded. Only 6 patients (1.8%) in our study group had late complications (1 case of migration of the catheter, 2 cases of infection, and 3 cases of withdrawal occlusion). The catheter life ranged from 6 to 1487 days (mean time, 348 days).

Conclusion  Our results confirm the safety, speed, and low cost of the open cutdown technique. This surgical procedure avoids both early and late complications that frequently occur with percutaneous access. Surgical cutdown should be considered the technique of choice to implant the TIVAD, especially in cancer patients.

From the First Surgical Clinic (Drs Di Carlo, La Greca, Russello, Puleo, and Latteri) and the Department of Radiology (Dr Privitera), University of Catania; and the Department of Clinical Oncology, San Luigi Hospital (Dr Cordio), Catania, Italy.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: a randomized trial
Biffi et al.
Ann Oncol 2009;20:935-940.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cephalic Vein Cutdown Approach for Long-term Indwelling Central Venous Access
Povoski
Arch Surg 2002;137:746-747.
FULL TEXT