 |
|
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Biopsy Methods for Suspicious Mammographic Lesions
Bridget N. Fahy, MD;
Richard J. Bold, MD;
Philip D. Schneider, MD,PhD;
Vijay Khatri, MD;
James E. Goodnight, Jr, MD,PhD
Arch Surg. 2001;136:990-995.
Hypothesis Stereotactic core biopsy (SCB) is more cost-effective than needle-localized biopsy (NLB) for evaluation and treatment of mammographic lesions.
Design A computer-generated mathematical model was developed based on clinical outcome modeling to estimate costs accrued during evaluation and treatment of suspicious mammographic lesions. Total costs were determined for evaluation and subsequent treatment of cancer when either SCB or NLB was used as the initial biopsy method. Cost was estimated by the cumulative work relative value units accrued. The risk of malignancy based on the Breast Imaging Reporting Data System (BIRADS) score and mammographic suspicion of ductal carcinoma in situ were varied to simulate common clinical scenarios.
Main Outcome Measures Total cost accumulated during evaluation and subsequent surgical therapy (if required).
Results Evaluation of BIRADS 5 lesions (highly suggestive, risk of malignancy = 90%) resulted in equivalent relative value units for both techniques (SCB, 15.54; NLB, 15.47). Evaluation of lesions highly suspicious for ductal carcinoma in situ yielded similar total treatment relative value units (SCB, 11.49; NLB, 10.17). Only for evaluation of BIRADS 4 lesions (suspicious abnormality, risk of malignancy = 34%) was SCB more cost-effective than NLB (SCB, 7.65 vs NLB, 15.66).
Conclusions No difference in cost-benefit was found when lesions highly suggestive of malignancy (BIRADS 5) or those suspicious for ductal carcinoma in situ were evaluated initially with SCB vs NLB, thereby disproving the hypothesis. Only for intermediate-risk lesions (BIRADS 4) did initial evaluation with SCB yield a greater cost savings than with NLB.
From the Department of Surgery, University of California–Davis Medical Center, Sacramento.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2001;136(9):1089-1090.
FULL TEXT
This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2001;136(9):986.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
External Imaging of CCND1 Cancer Gene Activity in Experimental Human Breast Cancer Xenografts with 99mTc-Peptide-Peptide Nucleic Acid-Peptide Chimeras
Tian et al.
JNM 2004;45:2070-2082.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cost Minimization Study of Image-Guided Core Biopsy Versus Surgical Excisional Biopsy for Women With Abnormal Mammograms
Golub et al.
JCO 2004;22:2430-2437.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
