This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (114)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Quality of Care, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Shukri F. Khuri, MD; Jennifer Daley, MD; William G. Henderson, PhD

Arch Surg. 2002;137:20-27.

Prompted by the need to assess comparatively the quality of surgical care in 133 Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals, the Department of Veterans Affairs conducted the National VA Surgical Risk Study between October 1, 1991, and December 31, 1993, in 44 VA medical centers. The study developed and validated models for risk adjustment of 30-day morbidity and 30-day mortality after major surgery in 8 noncardiac surgical specialties. Similar models were developed for cardiac surgery by the VA's Continuous Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Program. Based on the results of the National VA Surgical Risk Study and the Continuous Improvement in Cardiac Surgery Program, the VA established in 1994 a VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), in which all the medical centers performing major surgery participated. An NSQIP nurse at each center oversees the prospective collection of data and their electronic transmission for analysis at 1 of 2 data coordinating centers. Feedback to the providers and managers is aimed at achieving continuous quality improvement. It consists of (1) comparative, site-specific, and outcome-based annual reports; (2) periodic assessment of performance; (3) self-assessment tools; (4) structured site visits; and (5) dissemination of best practices. The NSQIP also provides an infrastructure to enable the VA investigators to query the database and produce scientific presentations and publications. Since the inception of the NSQIP data collection process, the 30-day postoperative mortality after major surgery in the VA has decreased by 27%, and the 30-day morbidity by 45%. The future of the NSQIP lies in expanding it to the private sector and in enhancing its capabilities by incorporating additional measures of outcome, structure, process, and cost.

From the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury (Drs Khuri and Daley), and Brigham and Women's Hospital (Dr Khuri) and Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital/Partners Healthcare System (Dr Daley), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass; and Hines Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Hines, Ill (Dr Henderson).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2002;137(1):116-117.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Predictors of Long-term Mortality After Bariatric Surgery Performed in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers
Arterburn et al.
Arch Surg 2009;144:914-920.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Operating-Room Throughput: Strategies for Improvement
Saleh et al.
JBJS 2009;91:2028-2039.
FULL TEXT  

New World of Patient Safety: 23rd Annual Samuel Jason Mixter Lecture
Leape
Arch Surg 2009;144:394-398.
FULL TEXT  

The Right Stuff: Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Project
Lagasse
Anesth. Analg. 2008;107:1772-1774.
FULL TEXT  

Risk of Complications From Enterotomy or Unplanned Bowel Resection During Elective Hernia Repair
Gray et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:582-586.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring and Improving the Quality of Care for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery
Dimick and Upchurch
Circulation 2008;117:2534-2541.
FULL TEXT  

Patient Risk Factors, Operative Care, and Outcomes Among Older Community-Dwelling Male Veterans with Hip Fracture
Radcliff et al.
JBJS 2008;90:34-42.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Utilization of Joint Arthroplasty: Racial and Ethnic Disparitiesin the Veterans Affairs Health Care System
Rowley et al.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;15:S43-S48.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Estimating the potential impact of regionalizing health care delivery based on volume standards versus risk-adjusted mortality rate
Glance et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:195-202.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The value of administrative databases
Mohammed and Stevens
BMJ 2007;334:1014-1015.
FULL TEXT  

Quantifying Risk and Benchmarking Performance in the Adult Intensive Care Unit
Higgins
J Intensive Care Med 2007;22:141-156.
ABSTRACT  

Reduction of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia After Participation in the Breathsavers Group of the Vermont Oxford Network Neonatal Intensive Care Quality Improvement Collaborative
Payne et al.
Pediatrics 2006;118:S73-S77.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What the surgeon of tomorrow needs to know about evidence-based surgery.
Maier
Arch Surg 2006;141:317-323.
FULL TEXT  

Strategies for improving surgical quality--should payers reward excellence or effort?
Birkmeyer and Birkmeyer
NEJM 2006;354:864-870.
FULL TEXT  

Surgery in Rural America
Finlayson
SURG INNOV 2005;12:299-305.
ABSTRACT  

Quality Improvement Organizations and Hospital Care
Bratzler
JAMA 2005;294:2028-2029.
FULL TEXT  

National Trends in Outcomes for Esophageal Resection
Dimick et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2005;79:212-216.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical Mortality as an Indicator of Hospital Quality: The Problem With Small Sample Size
Dimick et al.
JAMA 2004;292:847-851.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

National Variation in Operative Mortality Rates for Esophageal Resection and the Need for Quality Improvement
Dimick et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:1305-1309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT