This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (7)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Anesthesia  • Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine  • Adult Critical Care  • Alert me on articles by topic

Therèse M. Duane, MD; Jeffrey L. Riblet, MD; David Golay, MURP; Frederic J. Cole, Jr, MD; Leonard J. Weireter, Jr, MD; L. D. Britt, MD,MPH,FCCM

Arch Surg. 2002;137:1223-1227.

Hypothesis  The use of weaning and sedation protocols affects the intensive care unit (ICU) course of a trauma population.

Design  Nonrandomized before-after trial.

Setting  A level I trauma center.

Patients  Three hundred twenty-eight consecutive trauma patients receiving mechanical ventilation treated in the ICU between October 1, 1997, and November 1, 1999.

Intervention  Sedation and weaning protocols were used to treat patients receiving mechanical ventilation during the second year of this study.

Main Outcome Measures  Self-extubation rates, ventilator days, number of ICU days, and charges.

Results  There were 168 patients in the preprotocol group (year 1: October 1, 1997, to October 31, 1998) and 160 patients in the postprotocol group (year 2: November 1, 1998, to November 30, 1999). The groups were similar in age (P = .68), Injury Severity Score (P = .06), and Glasgow Coma Scale score (P = .29). There were no differences in self-extubation rates (P = .57), ventilator days (P = .83), ventilator charges (P = .83), number of ICU days (P = .67), or ICU charges (P = .67) between the 2 groups. No statistical difference was identified in any of these categories when long-term ventilator patients (defined as ventilator length of stay 3 SDs above the mean) were excluded.

Conclusions  Use of weaning and sedation protocols did not affect the measured outcomes in this study. These findings may reflect difficulties inherent in the protocols or with their utilization. Further subgroup analysis focusing on ventilator-associated pneumonias and mortality may demonstrate benefits not identified herein.

From the Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Improving Adherence to a Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Protocol for Critically Ill Adults: Outcomes After an Implementation Program
McLean et al.
Am J Crit Care 2006;15:299-309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Prospective, Controlled Trial of a Protocol-based Strategy to Discontinue Mechanical Ventilation
Krishnan et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2004;169:673-678.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT