You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 12, December 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (62)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology, Other
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Surgical Interventions, Other
 •Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of Percutaneous Cryosurgery and Percutaneous Radiofrequency for Unresectable Hepatic Malignancies

René Adam, MD,PhD; Ellen J. Hagopian, MD; Marcelo Linhares, MD; Jinane Krissat, MD; Eric Savier, MD; Daniel Azoulay, MD,PhD; Francis Kunstlinger, MD; Denis Castaing, MD; Henri Bismuth, MD

Arch Surg. 2002;137:1332-1339.

Hypothesis  The complication and success rates in patients treated with either percutaneous cryosurgery (PCS) or percutaneous radiofrequency (PRF) for unresectable hepatic malignancies are similar.

Design  Retrospective study.

Setting  University hospital.

Patients and Methods  Sixty-four patients were treated with either PCS (n = 31) or PRF (n = 33). Patient treatment was based on the random availability of the probes. Tumors were evaluated by a blinded comparison of pretreatment and posttreatment helical computed tomographic scans. All living patients had at least a 6-month follow-up.

Main Outcome Measures  Complication rate, initial treatment success (complete devascularization of the tumor), and local recurrence (tumor revascularization within or at its periphery).

Results  The distribution of tumor types was similar in the 2 groups (P = .76). One patient with cirrhosis died of variceal hemorrhage on day 30 after PCS (mortality, 3.2%), while no mortality was observed after PRF (P = .48). Complications occurred in 9 (29%) of the patients following PCS and in 8 (24%) of the patients following PRF (P = .66). Initial treatment success was comparable in the 2 treatment groups (30 [83%] of 36 tumors following PCS vs 34 [83%] of 41 tumors following PRF). However, local recurrences occurred more frequently after PCS than after PRF (16 [53%] of 30 vs 6 [18%] of 34; P = .003). The higher rate of local recurrence was identified for metastases (10 [71%] of 14 after PCS vs 3 [19%] of 16 after PRF; P = .004), while the difference was not significant for hepatocellular carcinoma (6 [38%] of 16 after PCS vs 3 [17%] of 18 after PRF; P = .25). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the use of PCS (P = .003) and more than 1 treatment (P = .05) were independent risk factors for local tumor recurrence.

Conclusion  While similar initial treatment success and complication rates are observed following either PCS or PRF, local recurrences occur more frequently following PCS, particularly for metastases.


From the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Hôpital Paul Brousse, Université Paris Sud, Villejuif, France.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2002;137(12):1330.
FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Percutaneous Cryosurgery and Percutaneous Radiofrequency for Unresectable Hepatic Malignancies—Invited Critique
Jack Pickleman
Arch Surg. 2002;137(12):1340.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Ex Vivo Evaluation of a Bipolar Application Concept for Radiofrequency Ablation
ZURBUCHEN et al.
Anticancer Res 2009;29:1309-1314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Histopathologic and Immunohistochemical Features of Tissue Adherent to Multitined Electrodes after RF Ablation of Liver Malignancies Can Help Predict Local Tumor Progression: Initial Results
Sofocleous et al.
Radiology 2008;249:364-374.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Liver Resection With a New Multiprobe Bipolar Radiofrequency Device
Ayav et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:396-401.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases
Garden et al.
Gut 2006;55:iii1-iii8.
FULL TEXT  

Current techniques and results of liver resection for colorectal liver metastases
Hamady et al.
Br Med Bull 2004;70:87-104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Liver ablation therapy
Gillams
Br. J. Radiol. 2004;77:713-723.
FULL TEXT  

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Lung Tumors with Expandable Needle Electrodes: Tips from Preliminary Experience
Steinke et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004;183:605-611.
FULL TEXT  

Cryotherapy and Percutaneous Ablation
Shapiro et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004;182:1597-1597.
FULL TEXT  

Percutaneous Ablation of Liver Tumors
Boyle
Arch Surg 2003;138:809-809.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.