You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 12, December 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Hematology/ Hematologic Malignancies
 •Endocrine Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Splenectomy vs Conventional Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Cases of Splenomegaly

Michael Rosen, MD; Fred Brody, MD; R. Matthew Walsh, MD; Jeffrey Ponsky, MD

Arch Surg. 2002;137:1348-1352.

Hypothesis  Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is the procedure of choice for elective splenectomy. Splenomegaly may preclude safe mobilization and hilar control using conventional laparoscopic techniques. Hand-assisted LS (HALS) may offer the same benefits of minimally invasive surgery for splenomegaly while allowing safe manipulation and splenic dissection.

Design  A retrospective review of patients with splenomegaly undergoing conventional LS or HALS was performed.

Setting  Tertiary care referral center.

Patients  Hand-assisted LS was performed at the start of the operation for patients with splenomegaly; splenomegaly was determined by palpation of the splenic tip extending to the midline or the iliac crest, or by a craniocaudal splenic length of greater than 22 cm. Splenomegaly was defined as a splenic weight of greater than 700 g after morcellation.

Main Outcome Measures  Patient demographic characteristics, operative indications, splenic weight after morcellation, morbidity, mortality, and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Results  Forty-five patients with splenomegaly were identified: 31 underwent standard LS and 14 underwent HALS. The HALS group had significantly larger spleens than the conventional LS group (mean weight, 1516 vs 1031 g; P = .02). Mean operative time (177 vs 186 minutes; P = .89), estimated blood loss (602 vs 376 mL; P = .17), and length of hospital stay (5.4 vs 4.2 days; P = .24) and complication rates (5 [36%] of 14 vs 5 [16%] of 31; P = .70) were similar between the HALS and the standard LS groups. No perioperative mortality occurred.

Conclusions  Hand-assisted LS is a safe and efficacious procedure for these extremely difficult cases. Hand-assisted LS provides the benefits of a minimally invasive approach in cases of splenomegaly.


From the Department of General Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.


RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2002;137(12):1330.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Can We Predict Immediate Outcome After Laparoscopic Splenectomy for Splenomegaly? Multivariate Analysis of Clinical, Anatomic, and Pathologic Features After 3D Reconstruction of the Spleen
Berindoague et al.
SURG INNOV 2007;14:243-251.
ABSTRACT  

"Splenectomy: From Bucket to Bag"
Morgenstern
SURG INNOV 2006;13:290-292.
 

Is the Laparoscopic Approach Reasonable in Cases of Splenomegaly?
Targarona et al.
SURG INNOV 2004;11:185-190.
ABSTRACT  

Laparoscopy for Malignancy: The Role of Handoscopy
Siu and Li
SURG INNOV 2004;11:53-60.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.