You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 3, March 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Effective Prevention of Adhesions With Hyaluronate

Klaus Kramer, MD; Norbert Senninger, MD, FACS; Hermann Herbst, MD, MRCPath; Wolfgang Probst, MD

Arch Surg. 2002;137:278-282.

Hypothesis  Hyaluronate sodium in the form of a bioresorbant membrane reduces the development of intra-abdominal adhesions frequently found after implantation of synthetic mesh in the context of surgical hernia repair.

Design  The effect of hyaluronate on the formation of adhesions was evaluated when applied laparoscopically as a bioresorbant membrane to protect the peritoneal surface of a synthetic mesh.

Setting  Experimental animal model.

Interventions  A peritoneal defect 5 cm in diameter was bilaterally created in the abdominal wall of each of 9 pigs by laparoscopy. A polypropylene mesh was fixed with clips onto these defects on both sides. In each of the animals, only on one side, the synthetic mesh was also covered by a hyaluronate membrane.

Main Outcome Measures  The incidence and severity of adhesions (grade 0-4, where 0 indicates no adhesion; 1, filmy avascular adhesions; 2, vascular adhesions; 3, cordlike fibrous adhesions; and 4, plain fibrous adhesions) were determined after 45 days, comparing treated and untreated sides by autopsy results and histological features.

Results  Adhesions, mainly grades 3 and 4, occurred in 7 of the 9 animals in those meshes not covered by hyaluronate; 2 untreated animals did not develop adhesions. On the other hand, only 1 of the 9 animals developed adhesions (grade 2) at the mesh concealed by the hyaluronate membrane.

Conclusions  The bioresorbant hyaluronate membrane significantly reduced the formation of peritoneal adhesions (1-sided sign test, P<.05) induced by the insertion of a polypropylene mesh, when compared with the contralateral implants not protected by hyaluronate. Thus, hyaluronate membranes are efficient for reducing the incidence of peritoneal adhesions.


From the Department of Surgery (Drs Kramer and Senninger) and the Gerhard-Domagk Institute of Pathology (Dr Herbst), University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; and the Department of Surgery, Ammerland Hospital, Westerstede, Germany (Dr Probst).


RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2002;137(3):249.
FULL TEXT  

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2002;137(3):365-366.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effect of Intraperitoneal Antiadhesive Fluids in a Rat Peritonitis Model
Muller et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:286-290.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hyaluronate Does Not Prevent Adhesions
Amid et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:1313-1313.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.