You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 3, March 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatology
 •Melanoma
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Clinical Node-Negative Thick Melanoma

George I. Salti, MD; Ashwin Kansagra, MD; Michael A. Warso, MD; Salve G. Ronan, MD; Tapas K. Das Gupta, MD, PhD, DSc

Arch Surg. 2002;137:291-295.

Background  Patients with T4 N0 M0 melanoma are considered at high risk for having occult metastases, and adjuvant therapy is usually recommended.

Hypothesis  Long-term survival in patients with thick melanoma is not universally poor.

Design  A retrospective study.

Setting  University teaching hospital.

Patients  We evaluated clinical node-negative thick (>=4.0 mm) melanoma in 151 patients who received their primary definitive surgical treatment in our department. None of these patients received any adjuvant therapy.

Results  Median follow-up was 44 months; median thickness, 5.5 mm. Median overall (OS) and disease-free survivals (DFS) were 70 (5-year survival, 52%) and 51 months (5-year survival, 47%), respectively. Patients with node-positive disease faired significantly worse than did those with node-negative disease. Median OS and DFS for patients with node-positive disease were 49 and 32 months (5-year survival, 35%), respectively, compared with 209 (5-year survival, 61%) and 165 months (5-year survival, 56%), respectively, for patients with node-negative disease. Similarly, OS and DFS were significantly lower when the primary tumor had at least 5 mitoses/mm2 or was located in the head and neck region. After multivariate analysis, status of the lymph nodes was the most predictive variable for OS and DFS.

Conclusions  The thickness of melanoma, by itself, should not be used as a criterion for adjuvant therapy. Other prognostic factors should be considered.


From the Departments of Surgical Oncology (Drs Salti, Kansagra, Warso, and Das Gupta) and Pathology (Dr Ronan), College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Dr Ronan is deceased.


RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2002;137(3):249.
FULL TEXT  

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2002;137(3):365-366.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Prognosis of Patients With Thick Primary Melanomas: Is Regional Lymph Node Status Relevant, and Does Removing Positive Regional Nodes Influence Outcome?
Thompson and Shaw
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2002;9:719-722.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.