You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 3, March 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (52)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Stapled vs Excision Hemorrhoidectomy

Long-term Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial

Franc H. Hetzer, MD; Nicolas Demartines, MD; Alexander E. Handschin, MD; Pierre-Alain Clavien, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 2002;137:337-340.

Hypothesis  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy offers several advantages over excision hemorrhoidectomy, including reduced postoperative pain, a reduced hospital stay, and an earlier recovery time. Furthermore, stapled hemorrhoidectomy is associated with lower hemorrhoidal recurrence on long-term follow-up.

Design  A randomized prospective trial. Patients were blinded to the operation technique used. Follow-up occurred at 1 and 3 weeks and 12 months postoperatively.

Setting  A university hospital providing primary, secondary, and tertiary care.

Patients  Forty patients with second- and third-degree hemorrhoid disease were randomized to undergo either stapled or excision hemorrhoidectomy. Two patients were excluded. All patients were subject to a follow-up examination.

Interventions  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy (Longo technique) vs excision hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson technique).

Main Outcome Measures  Operating time, postoperative pain (measured by the visual analog scale), hospital stay, histologic features, morbidity, defecation habit, continence, recovery time (return to work), and hemorrhoid recurrence at 1 year.

Results  Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy was associated with a significantly reduced operating time (30 vs 43.25 minutes; P<.001), reduced postoperative pain scores (visual analog score) on the first 4 postoperative days (day 1: 2.7 vs 6.3; day 2: 1.7 vs 6.3; day 3: 0.8 vs 5.4; and day 4: 0.5 vs 4.8, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10, maximum pain; P<=.001), and an earlier return to work (6.7 vs 20.7 days;P = .001). There were no differences for stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy in length of hospital stay (2.4 vs 2.1 days), complications (3 [15%] of 20 patients vs 5 [25%] of 20 patients), and recurrence rate (1 [5%] of 20 patients vs 1 [5%] of 20 patients).

Conclusions  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is associated with reduced postoperative pain, earlier recovery time and return to work, and a similar recurrence rate compared with the excision technique. Provided further clinical trials confirm these findings, stapled hemorrhoidectomy may become a future gold standard.


From the Department for Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Novel Technology and Innovations in Colorectal Surgery: The Circular Stapler for Treatment of Hemorrhoids and Fibrin Glue for Treatment of Perianal Fistulae
Person and Wexner
SURG INNOV 2004;11:241-252.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.