This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (39)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Surgical Oncology  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging  • Alert me on articles by topic

Arch Surg. 2002;137:447-451.

Hypothesis  Rectal cancer can be accurately staged preoperatively by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with external phase-arrayed coils.

Design  Comparison of MRIs with pathologic staging.

Setting  University hospital.

Patients  Twenty-eight consecutive patients with biopsy-proven rectal cancer who did not undergo irradiation.

Intervention  Patients underwent imaging using a 1.5-T MRI scanner with external phase-arrayed surface coils. Streaking of the perirectal fat and disruption of the bowel wall margin were interpreted as transmural invasion. Lymph nodes were defined as metastatic when they had a diameter of at least 0.5 cm. Tumors were staged according to the TNM staging system (American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines) as confined to the bowel wall (T1-T2) and invading through the bowel wall (T3-T4). Patients underwent anterior resection (n = 15), abdominoperineal resection (n = 11), or local excision (n = 2).

Main Outcome Measures  Calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for invasion through the bowel wall and lymph node status.

Results  Sensitivity of MRI in detecting invasion through the bowel wall was 89% (16/18), specificity was 80% (8/10), and accuracy was 86% (24/28). Sensitivity for malignant lymphadenopathy was 67% (8/12), specificity was 71% (10/14), and accuracy 69% (18/26).

Conclusion  Although more costly and not as accurate as endoscopic ultrasound, MRI with phase-arrayed coils had excellent sensitivity at detecting transmural penetration of rectal cancer.

From the Departments of Surgical Oncology (Drs Gagliardi, Bayar, and Salem) and Diagnostic Radiology (Dr Smith), Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. Dr Smith is now with the Department of Radiology, Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY.

RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2002;137(4):389.
FULL TEXT  

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2002;137(4):496-497.
FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

3-T MRI of Rectal Carcinoma: Preoperative Diagnosis, Staging, and Planning of Sphincter-Sparing Surgery
Zhang et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;190:1271-1278.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

cT3N0 Rectal Cancer: Potential Overtreatment With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Is Warranted
Guillem et al.
JCO 2008;26:368-373.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimal Methods for Staging Rectal Cancer
Muthusamy and Chang
Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:6877s-6884s.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography.
Chun et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006;187:1557-1562.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MR Imaging: correlation with surgical and histopathologic findings.
Iafrate et al.
RadioGraphics 2006;26:701-714.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Concepts in Lymph Node Imaging
Torabi et al.
JNM 2004;45:1509-1518.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rectal Cancer: Local Staging and Assessment of Lymph Node Involvement with Endoluminal US, CT, and MR Imaging--A Meta-Analysis
Bipat et al.
Radiology 2004;232:773-783.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rectal Cancer: Review with Emphasis on MR Imaging
Beets-Tan and Beets
Radiology 2004;232:335-346.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT