You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 5, May 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Standardized Trauma Resuscitation

Female Hearts Respond Better

Arch Surg. 2002;137:578-584.

Hypothesis  Women respond better to standardized shock resuscitation compared with similarly severely injured men.

Design  Severely injured patients who met specific criteria were resuscitated using a standardized protocol with no adjustment for gender. The resuscitation protocol was used to attain and to maintain an oxygen delivery index of 600 mL/min · m2 or greater (DO2I >=600) for the first 24 hours in the intensive care unit (ICU). Interventions, responses, and outcomes for the 2 cohorts were compared. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance, {chi}2, and t tests; P<.05 was considered significant.

Setting  A 20-bed regional level I trauma center ICU.

Patients  Patients at high risk of postinjury multiple organ failure (major organ or vascular injury and/or skeletal fractures, initial arterial base deficit of 6 mEq/L or greater, requirement for 6 units or more of packed red blood cells in the first 12 hours after hospital admission, or age >=65 years with any 2 previous criteria).

Interventions  Pulmonary artery catheter, packed red blood cell transfusion, crystalloid fluid infusion, inotrope, and vasopressor support, as needed, in that sequence, to maintain DO2I >=600.

Main Outcome Measures  Hemodynamic response to resuscitation, fluid, and packed red blood cell volume.

Results  During 2000, 58 patients (38 men, 20 women) met criteria and were resuscitated using our standardized protocol. Demographics and outcomes were similar for both cohorts. Requirements for and responses to standardized resuscitation were also similar, except for volume loading. The female cohort required less lactated Ringer solution volume (12 ± 1 vs 8 ± 2 L, P<.05), required less Starling curve intervention (42% vs 15%, P<.05), and maintained the DO2I goal with average pulmonary capillary wedge pressure that was less than that of the male cohort.

Conclusion  Review of prospective data from standardized shock resuscitation for female and male cohorts demonstrates that women respond better to standardized resuscitation compared with similarly severely injured men.


From the Department of Surgery (Drs McKinley, Kozar, Cocanour, Sailors, Ware, and Moore) University of Texas–Houston Medical School, and Shock Trauma Intensive Care Unit (Ms Valdivia), Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston.


RELATED ARTICLE

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2002;137(5):625-626.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Salutary effects of androstenediol on cardiac function and splanchnic perfusion after trauma-hemorrhage
Shimizu et al.
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2004;287:R386-R390.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sex Differences in Hepatic Heme Oxygenase Expression and Activity Following Trauma and Hemorrhagic Shock
Toth et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:1375-1382.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Supranormal Trauma Resuscitation Causes More Cases of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
Balogh et al.
Arch Surg 2003;138:637-643.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Crystalloid Resuscitation: A Waste of Blood?
Lyons
Arch Surg 2003;138:227-227.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.