You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 6, June 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (87)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Hepatobiliary Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Extended Hepatectomy in Patients With Hepatobiliary Malignancies With and Without Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization

Eddie K. Abdalla, MD; Carlton C. Barnett, MD; Dorota Doherty, PhD; Steven A. Curley, MD; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey, MD

Arch Surg. 2002;137:675-681.

Hypothesis  Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) allows potentially curative hepatic resection without additional morbidity or mortality in patients with hepatobiliary malignancies who are marginal candidates for resection based on small liver remnant size.

Design  A retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients in a multi-institutional database who underwent extended hepatectomy.

Setting  University-based referral centers.

Patients  Forty-two patients underwent preoperative determination of the future liver remnant (FLR) volume before extended hepatectomy (>=5 segments) for hepatobiliary malignancy without chronic underlying liver disease. Patients were stratified by treatment with or without preoperative PVE.

Intervention  Preoperative percutaneous PVE.

Main Outcome Measures  Clinical characteristics, FLR volume, operative morbidity, and survival.

Results  There was no difference between the groups that did and did not undergo PVE for the number of tumors, tumor size, estimated blood loss, duration of the operation, complexity of resection, or surgical margins. The FLR at presentation was significantly smaller in patients who underwent PVE than in patients who did not undergo PVE (18% vs 23%; P<.001). After PVE, FLR volumes increased significantly (P = .003); preoperative FLR volumes were similar in both groups (patients who underwent PVE, 25%; and patients who did not undergo PVE, 23%). There was no perioperative mortality and no statistical difference in the incidence of perioperative complications between those who did and those who did not undergo PVE (5 [28%] of 18 patients vs 5 [21%] of 24 patients). The overall 3-year survival was 65% and the median survival duration was equivalent in the 2 groups (40 vs 52 months for those who did vs those who did not undergo PVE).

Conclusion  Portal vein embolization enables safe and potentially curative extended hepatectomy in a subset of patients who would otherwise be marginal candidates for resection based on a small liver remnant size.


From the Departments of Surgical Oncology (Drs Abdalla, Barnett, Curley, and Vauthey) and Biostatistics (Dr Doherty), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Expanding Criteria for Resectability of Colorectal Liver Metastases
Pawlik et al.
The Oncologist 2008;13:51-64.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization and Surgical Resection in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Small Future Liver Remnant Volume: Comparison with Transarterial Chemoembolization
Seo et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:3501-3509.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Recurrence and Survival Outcomes after Hepatic Resection with or without Cryotherapy for Liver Metastases from Colorectal Carcinoma
Niu et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:2078-2087.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Presurgical Chemotherapy in Patients Being Considered for Liver Resection
Kemeny
The Oncologist 2007;12:825-839.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selection of Patients for Resection of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases: Expert Consensus Statement
Charnsangavej et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006;13:1261-1268.
FULL TEXT  

Improving Resectability of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases: Expert Consensus Statement
Abdalla et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006;13:1271-1280.
FULL TEXT  

Improving Resectability of Hepatic Colorectal Metastases: Expert Consensus Statement By Abdalla et al.
Adams et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006;13:1281-1283.
FULL TEXT  

Downstaging or Downsizing: Time for a New Staging System in Advanced Colorectal Cancer?
Poston et al.
JCO 2006;24:2702-2706.
FULL TEXT  

Portal vein embolisation prior to hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases and the effects of periprocedure chemotherapy.
Beal et al.
Br. J. Radiol. 2006;79:473-478.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chemotherapy Regimen Predicts Steatohepatitis and an Increase in 90-Day Mortality After Surgery for Hepatic Colorectal Metastases
Vauthey et al.
JCO 2006;24:2065-2072.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Solitary Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Resection Determines Outcome
Aloia et al.
Arch Surg 2006;141:460-467.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

One Surgeon's Unabashedly Biased View on Liver Resection
Curley
JCO 2005;23:8286-8288.
FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Treatment of Cholangiocarcinoma
Anderson et al.
The Oncologist 2004;9:43-57.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.