 |
 |

Prospective Evaluation of the Safety of Enoxaparin Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhagic Injuries
Scott H. Norwood, MD;
Clyde E. McAuley, MD;
John D. Berne, MD;
Van L. Vallina, MD;
D. Brent Kerns, MD;
Thomas W. Grahm, MD;
Kevin Short, MD;
Jerry W. McLarty, PhD
Arch Surg. 2002;137:696-702.
Background Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhagic injuries (IHIs) are at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The safety of early anticoagulation for IHI has not been established.
Hypothesis Enoxaparin can be safely administered to most patients with IHI for VTE prophylaxis.
Setting Level I trauma center.
Design Prospective, single-cohort, observational study.
Patients and Methods One hundred fifty (85%) of 177 patients with blunt IHI received enoxaparin beginning approximately 24 hours after hospital admission until discharge. Brain computed tomographic (CT) scans were performed at admission, 24 hours after admission, and at variable intervals thereafter based on clinical course. Patients were excluded for coagulopathy, heparin allergy, expected brain death or discharge within 48 hours, and age younger than 14 years. Complications of enoxaparin prophylaxis were defined as Marshall CT grade progression of IHI, expansion of an existing IHI, or development of a new hemorrhagic lesion on follow-up CT after beginning enoxaparin use.
Results Thirty-four patients (23%) had CT progression of IHI. Twenty-eight CT scans (19%) worsened before enoxaparin therapy and 6 (4%) worsened after beginning enoxaparin use. No differences between operative patient (2/24, 8%) and nonoperative patient (4/126, 3%) complications were identified (P = .23). Study group mortality was 7% (10/150). All 6 patients who developed progression of IHI after initiation of enoxaparin therapy survived hospitalization. A deep vein thrombosis was identified in 2 (2%) of 106 patients.
Conclusion Enoxaparin can be safely used for VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients with IHI when started 24 hours after hospital admission or after craniotomy.
From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Norwood, McAuley, Berne, Vallina, and Kerns), Neurosurgery (Dr Grahm), and Radiology (Dr Short), East Texas Medical Center, Tyler, and the Department of Epidemiology/Biomathematics, The University of Texas Health Center, Tyler (Dr McLarty).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2002;137(6):638.
FULL TEXT
Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2002;137(6):753-754.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Neurosurgery: A Metaanalysis
Collen et al.
Chest 2008;134:237-249.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)
Geerts et al.
Chest 2008;133:381S-453S.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Medication-Related Complications in the Trauma Patient
Corbett and Rebuck
J Intensive Care Med 2008;23:91-108.
ABSTRACT
Prevention of secondary brain injury following Head Trauma
Cowley and da Silva
Trauma 2008;10:35-42.
ABSTRACT
Traumatic brain injury: intensive care management
Helmy et al.
Br J Anaesth 2007;99:32-42.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prophylaxis Against Deep-Vein Thrombosis Following Trauma: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Mechanical and Pharmacologic Prophylaxis
Stannard et al.
JBJS 2006;88:261-266.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Geerts et al.
Chest 2004;126:338S-400S.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Anticoagulation in a head-injured patient
Ibrahim et al.
JRSM 2003;96:591-592.
FULL TEXT
|