You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 6, June 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Severity Scoring for Prognostication in Patients With Severe Acute Pancreatitis

Comparative Analysis of the Ranson Score and the APACHE III Score

Soumitra R. Eachempati, MD; Lynn J. Hydo, RN, MBA; Philip S. Barie, MD

Arch Surg. 2002;137:730-736.

Background  Despite a paucity of validation, the Ranson score is still the most popular method for gauging the severity of pancreatitis.

Hypotheses  The Ranson score more accurately predicts outcomes in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) when compared with APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) III scores, and the individual components of the Ranson score differ in their capacities to predict outcome in patients with SAP.

Methods  Patients admitted with SAP to a university surgical intensive care unit (ICU) were studied prospectively. Each component and the total Ranson score were recorded. Also recorded were the APACHE II and III scores. These Ranson variables were compared using univariate analysis of variance for mortality, need for operative debridement, and need for an ICU stay for longer than 7 days. Significant variables were then analyzed by a multivariate analysis of variance to assess independent predictors of mortality, the need for debridement, and prolonged length of stay. Data are given as the mean ± SEM.

Results  Seventy-six patients (21.1% mortality), aged 61.8 ± 1.9 years, were studied. The mean APACHE III score was 48.2 ± 3.3, and the mean ICU stay was 10.4 ± 2.1 days. The number of positive Ranson variables was significantly higher in nonsurvivors compared with survivors (5.6 ± 0.5 vs 3.4 ± 0.2; P<.001), as were the APACHE III score (76.9 ± 9.9 vs 40.5 ± 2.5; P<.001) and ICU stay (24.9 ± 7.5 vs 76.5 ± 1.9 days; P = .002). Ranson variables that predicted mortality included values for blood urea nitrogen, calcium, base deficit, and fluid sequestration.

Conclusions  The Ranson score remains a valid predictor of outcomes in patients with SAP, and individual Ranson variables determined 48 hours after hospital admission predicted adverse outcomes more accurately than early Ranson variables in patients with SAP.


From the Department of Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, and the Anne and Max A. Cohen Surgical Intensive Care Unit, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York.


RELATED ARTICLES

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2002;137(6):638.
FULL TEXT  

Archives of Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Surg. 2002;137(6):753-754.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

L-Alanyl-L-Glutamine-Supplemented Parenteral Nutrition Decreases Infectious Morbidity Rate in Patients With Severe Acute Pancreatitis
Fuentes-Orozco et al.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2008;32:403-411.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.