You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 137 No. 9, September 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Compression Stockings and Venous Function

Paul J. Zajkowski, BS, CCRP; Mary C. Proctor, MS; Thomas W. Wakefield, MD; Jess Bloom, RVT; Beverlee Blessing; Lazar J. Greenfield, MD

Arch Surg. 2002;137:1064-1068.

Hypothesis  Surgical compression stockings measurably improve venous physiologic mechanisms, and stocking brands do not differ from one another.

Methods  Eleven patients, (8 men and 3 women [mean age, 53 years]), were included. Six patients had primary venous insufficiency and 5 patients had secondary venous insufficiency; 5 patients were in CEAP class 4 and 6 were in CEAP class 5. Patients were randomly assigned to a sequence of 4 brands of knee-high, open-toe, 30– to 40–mm Hg stockings. Each patient wore a stocking for a 1-month equilibration period, then a different stocking monthly for 4 months in a row. Air plethysmography examinations were performed with and without stockings before and after each month of wear. Patients filled out a daily stocking record log and a monthly satisfaction survey. Stockings underwent compression testing after use.

Results  Stockings controlled reflux better than they improved calf muscle pump function. With stockings on, patients in CEAP 4 benefited more than those in CEAP 5 in decreasing reflux, while patients in CEAP 5 benefited more than those in CEAP 4 in improving calf muscle pump function. Changes in residual volume fraction were improved in patients in CEAP 5 wearing stockings but not in patients in CEAP 4. Patients with primary disease had greater volumes of reflux and calf ejection than with secondary disease. There were no hemodynamic differences between stocking brands but there were differences in patient compliance and acceptance.

Conclusions  Surgical support stockings seem to be more effective in controlling reflux than in improving calf muscle pump function. All stocking brands function equally as measured by air plethysmography.


From the Section of Vascular Surgery (Ms Proctor and Drs Wakefield and Greenfield), the Diagnostic Vascular Unit (Messrs Zajkowski and Bloom), and the Departments of Surgery and Orthotics and Prosthetics (Ms Blessing), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Chronic Venous Insufficiency
Eberhardt and Raffetto
Circulation 2005;111:2398-2409.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.