You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 138 No. 1, January 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Hepatobiliary Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Postoperative Complication Rates After Hepatic Resection in Maryland Hospitals

Justin B. Dimick, MD; Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD; John A. Cowan, Jr, MD; Pamela A. Lipsett, MD

Arch Surg. 2003;138:41-46.

Hypothesis  High-volume centers provide superior quality care and therefore have a lower incidence of postoperative complications.

Design  Observational statewide administrative database.

Setting  State of Maryland, nonfederal acute-care hospital (n = 52), performing liver resection (n = 35).

Patients  All patients discharged after undergoing hepatic resection from 1994 to 1998 (N = 569).

Main Outcome Measures  Two sequential analyses using multiple logistic regression of in-hospital mortality were performed to determine the relative importance of preoperative case-mix and postoperative complications.

Results  The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 4.8% and was significantly lower in high-volume hospitals (2.8%) than in low-volume hospitals (10.2%) (P<.001). After adjusting for case-mix in the multivariate analysis, low hospital volume was associated with a 3-fold increase in mortality (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-7.6; P = .02). Having surgery at a low-volume hospital was associated with increased rates of several postoperative complications: reintubation (relative risk [RR], 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8-3.4), pulmonary failure (RR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.6-3.5), pneumonia (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 1.0-5.6), acute renal failure (RR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7), acute myocardial infarction (RR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.9), and aspiration (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9-2.0). When considering all other factors using statistical methods, hospital volume was no longer associated with mortality.

Conclusions  Patients who undergo hepatic resection at low-volume hospitals are at a higher risk of postoperative complications and death than those who have the same operation at high-volume hospitals. The empirical difference between outcomes at high- and low-volume hospitals seems to be due to a variation in postoperative complications.


From the Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Drs Dimick and Cowan); the Departments of Surgery, Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (Drs Pronovost and Lipsett); and the Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore (Dr Provonost).


RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2003;138(1):6.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Complications Following Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
Barton et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2005;2005:61-66.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hepatic Resection at a Major Community-Based Teaching Hospital Can Result in Good Outcome
Metreveli et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2005;12:133-137.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.