You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 138 No. 10, October 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (15)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Endocrine Surgery
 •Endoscopy/ Minimally Invasive Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Incision Length for Standard Thyroidectomy and Parathyroidectomy

When Is It Minimally Invasive?

Laurent Brunaud, MD; Rasa Zarnegar, MD; Nobuyuki Wada, MD; Philip Ituarte, PhD; Orlo H. Clark, MD; Quan-Yang Duh, MD

Arch Surg. 2003;138:1140-1143.

Hypothesis  Current techniques for open conventional thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy have evolved to enable a shorter incision (main proposition), and the length of the incision is influenced by objective factors.

Design  Case series.

Setting  University referral center.

Patients and Intervention  Retrospective study of the most recent 200 primary consecutive routine thyroid and parathyroid operations (excluding neck dissections).

Main Outcome Measures  The length of incision was routinely measured with a ruler before the incision. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to distinguish variables affecting length of incision.

Results  Mean length of the incision was 5.5 cm for total thyroidectomy, 4.6 cm for lobectomy, and 3.5 cm for parathyroidectomy (P<.001). It was 4.1 cm for bilateral parathyroid exploration, but was reduced to 3.2 and 2.8 cm for unilateral (P<.001) and focal (P<.001) explorations, respectively. By multiple regression analysis, thyroid specimen volume and patient body mass index were independent predictors of incision length in thyroidectomy. Extent of exploration and resident training level were independent predictors of incision length in parathyroidectomy.

Conclusions  Current techniques for open conventional thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy have evolved to enable a shorter incision. Thyroid volume, patient body mass index, extent of the planned parathyroid exploration, and the resident clinical training stage are important variables for incision length in open operation and should be taken into account when minimally invasive thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy are evaluated.


From the Departments of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco (Drs Brunaud, Zarnegar, Wada, Ituarte, Clark, and Duh), and Mount Zion Medical Center, San Francisco (Drs Brunaud, Zarnegar, Wada, Ituarte, and Clark); and Surgical Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco (Dr Duh). Dr Brunaud is now with the Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, University of Nancy, Brabois, France.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Objective and Subjective Scar Aesthetics in Minimal Access vs Conventional Access Parathyroidectomy and Thyroidectomy Surgical Procedures: A Paired Cohort Study
O'Connell et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:85-93.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Minimally Invasive Surgery or Minimal-Incision Thyroidectomy?
Ng
Arch Surg 2004;139:802-802.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.