You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 138 No. 11, November 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Hepatobiliary Surgery
 •Liver/ Biliary Tract/ Pancreatic Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Perioperative and Long-term Outcome of Major Hepatic Resection for Small Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis

Brian Hung-Hin Lang, MBBS, MRCS(Edin); Ronnie Tung-Ping Poon, MS, FRCS(Edin); Sheung-Tat Fan, MS, MD, PhD, FRCS(Edin& Glasg); John Wong, PhD, FRACS

Arch Surg. 2003;138:1207-1213.

Hypothesis  Major hepatic resection is safe and provides favorable long-term survival for cirrhotic patients with a small solitary hepatocellular carcinoma.

Design  Retrospective case series.

Setting  Tertiary referral center.

Patients  From January 1, 1989, to December 31, 2001, 218 cirrhotic patients with a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma 5 cm or less in diameter underwent either a major hepatic resection (n = 84) or a minor hepatic resection (n = 134).

Major Outcome Measures  Perioperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival rates.

Results  The major resection group had significantly larger tumors (median, 3.5 vs 2.5 cm; P<.001) and better liver function (median indocyanine green retention at 15 minutes, 9.3% vs 12.9%; P<.001) than the minor resection group. Postoperative morbidity (46.4% vs 39.6%) and mortality (8.3% vs 3.0%) were higher in the major resection group than in the minor resection group, but the differences did not reach statistical significance (P = .32 and P = .11, respectively). The median overall survival did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (102.0 vs 72.3 months; P = .25). However, the median disease-free survival in the major resection group was significantly better than that in the minor resection group (59.0 vs 29.5 months; P = .03). On further subgroup analysis, both disease-free and overall survival rates were significantly better in the major hepatic resection group for tumors of 3 to 5 cm.

Conclusion  In well-selected cirrhotic patients with a small, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma, major hepatic resection is safe and may offer a better long-term survival over minor hepatic resection for patients with tumors of 3 to 5 cm.


From the Centre for the Study of Liver Disease and Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinomas Larger Than 3 cm in Diameter
Poon et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:281-287.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.