You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 138 No. 6, June 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Surgical Treatment of Appendiceal Mucocele

Luca Stocchi, MD; Bruce G. Wolff, MD; Dirk R. Larson, MS; Jeff R. Harrington, MA

Arch Surg. 2003;138:585-590.

Hypothesis  Clinical presentation of appendiceal mucocele is related to malignancy and can influence surgical approach.

Design  Retrospective study.

Setting  Tertiary referral center.

Patients  All cases of primary appendiceal mucoceles (simple mucocele, cystadenoma, cystadenocarcinoma) diagnosed between 1976 and 2000 were reviewed. There were 135 patients, 74 of whom were female. Mean age at diagnosis was 59 years. Mean follow-up was more than 6 years.

Interventions  A total of 129 patients underwent surgery, consisting of appendectomy (22 patients), right hemicolectomy (25 patients), or more extensive procedures (82 patients).

Main Outcome Measures  Clinical, diagnostic, and surgical variables were statistically compared with postoperative morbidity and mortality and the presence of malignancy. P<.05 was considered significant.

Results  The presence of symptoms was associated with malignancy (58% vs 15%, P<.001), particularly abdominal pain (56% vs 29%, P = .005) and weight loss (77% vs 31%, P = .002). Abdominal mass was also associated with malignancy (86% vs 25%, P<.001). Moreover, pseudomyxoma peritonei and mucocele extravasation were associated with malignancy (95% vs 13%, P<.001, and 83% vs 15%, P<.001, respectively). The lesion size was not associated with malignancy; however, cystadenomas were significantly larger than simple mucoceles (8.1 cm vs 4.1 cm, P<.001), and no cystadenoma was less than 2 cm in largest diameter.

Conclusions  A number of clinical, diagnostic, and intraoperative findings are associated with malignant mucoceles. All mucoceles greater than 2 cm should be excised to remove premalignant lesions.


From the Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery (Drs Wolff and Larson), Department of Surgery (Dr Stocchi), and the Department of Biostatistics (Mr Harrington), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Best Cases from the AFIP: Giant Mucinous Cystadenoma of the Appendix
Persaud et al.
RadioGraphics 2007;27:553-557.
FULL TEXT  

Giant mucocele of the appendix: clinical and imaging findings in 3 cases.
Francica et al.
J Ultrasound Med 2006;25:643-648.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.