 |
 |

Supranormal Trauma Resuscitation Causes More Cases of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
Zsolt Balogh, MD;
Bruce A. McKinley, PhD;
Christine S. Cocanour, MD;
Rosemary A. Kozar, MD, PhD;
Alicia Valdivia, RN;
R. Matthew Sailors, PhD;
Frederick A. Moore, MD
Arch Surg. 2003;138:637-643.
Hypothesis Normal resuscitation (oxygen delivery index [DO2I] 500 mL/min per square meter), compared with supranormal trauma resuscitation (DO2I 600 mL/min per square meter), requires less crystalloid volume, thus decreasing the incidence of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS).
Design Retrospective analysis of a prospective database.
Setting Twenty-bed intensive care unit (ICU) in a regional level I trauma center.
Patients Patients with major trauma (injury severity score >15, initial base deficit 6 mEq/L, or need for 6 units of packed red blood cells in the first 12 hours) or age 65 years or older with any 2 of the previous criteria.
Interventions Shock/trauma resuscitation protocol: pulmonary artery catheter, gastric tonometry, urinary bladder pressure measurements, lactated Ringer infusion, packed red blood cell transfusion, and moderate inotrope support, as needed, in that sequence, to attain and maintain a DO2I greater than or equal to 600 mL/min per m2 (16 months, ending January 1, 2001, n = 85) or a DO2I greater than or equal to 500 mL/min per square meter (16 months, starting January 1, 2001, n = 71) for the first 24 hours in the ICU.
Main Outcome Measures: Lactated Ringer infusion volume (liters) at ICU admission, gastric partial carbon dioxide minus end-tidal carbon dioxide(GAPCO2), IAH (urinary bladder pressure measurements >20 mm Hg), ACS (urinary bladder pressure measurements >25 mm Hg with organ dysfunction), multiple organ failure, and mortality.
Results Demographics, injury severity, and shock severity parameters were similar in both groups. The supranormal resuscitation group required more lactated Ringer infusion volume in the first 24 hours in the ICU (mean ± SD, 13 ± 2 vs 7 ± 1 L; P<.05) and had higher GAPCO2 (16 ± 2 vs 7 ± 1 mm Hg; P<.05). In the supranormal group, IAH (42% vs 20%; P<.05) and ACS (16% vs 8%; P<.05) were more frequent. The conventional trauma outcomes, such as multiple organ failure (22% vs 9%; P<.05) and mortality (27% vs 11%; P<.05) were less favorable in the supranormal resuscitation group.
Conclusion Supranormal resuscitation, compared with normal resuscitation, was associated with more lactated Ringer infusion, decreased intestinal perfusion (higher GAPCO2), and an increased incidence of IAH, ACS, multiple organ failure, and death.
From the Departments of Surgery and Shock Trauma, Intensive Care Unit, Memorial Hermann Hospital, University of TexasHouston Medical School, Houston.
RELATED ARTICLE
This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2003;138(6):581.
FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Abdominal compartment syndrome: an under-diagnosed contributory factor to morbidity and mortality in the critically ill
Hunter
Postgrad. Med. J. 2008;84:293-298.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Abdominal compartment syndrome: an emergency department perspective
Harrisson et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2008;25:128-132.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Is Common in Medical Intensive Care Unit Patients Receiving Large-Volume Resuscitation
Daugherty et al.
J Intensive Care Med 2007;22:294-299.
ABSTRACT
Resuscitation fluids in trauma, part II: which fluid should I give?
Vercueil et al.
Trauma 2006;8:111-121.
Measurement of intra-abdominal pressure in intensive care units in the United Kingdom: a national postal questionnaire study
Ravishankar and Hunter
Br J Anaesth 2005;94:763-766.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Blindness in the Intensive Care Unit
Jakob
Anesth. Analg. 2005;100:189-191.
FULL TEXT
The Best of the Best--2003
Peskin
Arch Surg 2004;139:709-711.
FULL TEXT
Supranormal Trauma Resuscitation and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome--Reply
Balogh et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:226-227.
FULL TEXT
Supranormal Trauma Resuscitation and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome
Ivatury
Arch Surg 2004;139:225-226.
FULL TEXT
|