You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 138 No. 8, August 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgical Interventions, Other
 •Women's Health
 •Pregnancy and Breast Feeding
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

In Utero Repair of Myelomeningocele

Experimental Pathophysiology, Initial Clinical Experience, and Outcomes

Diana L. Farmer, MD; Cornelia S. von Koch, MD, PhD; Warwick J. Peacock, MD; Moise Danielpour, MD; Nalin Gupta, MD, PhD; Hanmin Lee, MD; Michael R. Harrison, MD

Arch Surg. 2003;138:872-878.

Hypothesis  Experimental work raises the possibility that in utero repair of myelomeningocele (MMC) may improve lower extremity, bladder, and bowel function, ameliorate the Arnold-Chiari malformation, and decrease the need for postnatal shunting.

Design  We previously developed fetal lamb models to create and reverse lower extremity damage and the Arnold-Chiari malformation in utero. We then applied our extensive experience with fetal surgery, including fetal endoscopic (fetoscopic) surgical manipulation, to develop techniques for MMC repair.

Setting  A tertiary referral center.

Patients  All patients treated between 1998 and 2002 for a prenatally diagnosed MMC.

Interventions  Either fetoscopic MMC repair, fetoscopic patch repair, or limited maternal hysterotomy and microsurgical 3-layered fetal MMC repair was performed.

Main Outcome Measures  Gestational age at delivery, survival, neurologic outcome, and need for ventricular shunting at 1 year.

Results  Complete fetoscopic repair was accomplished in 1 fetus. Two other fetuses underwent partial fetoscopic procedures. The remaining 10 patients underwent limited maternal hysterotomy and microsurgical 3-layered fetal MMC repair. Four of 13 patients died, and the mean gestational age at delivery of 11 fetuses born alive was 31 weeks. Five of 9 required ventricular shunting by age 1 year. In 2 patients, lower extremity function improved by more than 2 vertebral levels compared with prenatal ultrasonography. Five of 10 patients who lived longer than 3 weeks required postnatal wound revision within 7 days after birth.

Conclusions  Fetoscopic repair, although feasible, does not yet yield optimal surgical results. Open surgical repair before 22 weeks' gestation is physiologically sound and technically feasible. One third of patients appear to be spared the need for a shunt at age 1 year, but improvement in distal neurologic function is less clear. Additionally, fetal mortality is associated with this procedure. Our results complement the data published by groups at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania, and Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn. A National Institutes of Health–sponsored prospective randomized trial is now underway at these 3 centers to compare fetal repair with postnatal repair.


From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Farmer, Lee, and Harrison) and Neurosurgery (Drs von Koch, Peacock, Danielpour, and Gupta) and the Fetal Treatment Center (Drs Farmer, van Koch, Lee, and Harrison), University of California, San Francisco.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Fetal Surgery
Kunisaki and Jennings
J Intensive Care Med 2008;23:33-51.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.