You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 138 No. 8, August 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Paper
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Women's Health
 •Women's Health, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Screening
 •Mammography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Surgical Outcomes of a Breast Cancer–Screening Program for Low-Income Women

Ricardo Jimenez-Lee, MD; Selene G. Oslak, MPH; Katrina Hedberg, MD, MPH; John T. Vetto, MD

Arch Surg. 2003;138:884-890.

Hypothesis  Surgical outcomes from a breast cancer–screening program of low-income women are similar to those of other screening programs.

Design  Prospective cohort.

Setting  Federally funded screening program.

Patients  A total of 15 730 women.

Interventions  A total of 23 149 mammograms, 20 396 with concomitant clinical breast examination, from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2001.

Outcome Measures  American College of Radiology scores; associated surgery consultations, biopsies, operations, and pathology results.

Results  Most (20 868) of the 21 296 mammograms assigned an American College of Radiology score were benign; only 428 (2%) were suspicious. Resulting from suspicious clinical breast examinations, the group with American College of Radiology scores of 1 to 3 accounted for 45%, 18%, and 10% of recommended surgical consultations, biopsies, and cancers detected, respectively. A rate of 12.3 cancers per 1000 women was found, greater than with other screening programs. Compliance with therapy was 97%.

Conclusions  This screening program had a higher rate of advanced cancers. Clinical breast examination was an important component, and compliance with surgical recommendations was excellent.


From the Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University (Drs Jimenez-Lee and Vetto), and the Oregon Breast and Cervical Cancer Program, Oregon Department of Human Services (Ms Oslak and Dr Hedberg), Portland.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Surgery
Arch Surg. 2003;138(8):821.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical Breast Exam Is Important in Cancer Screening
JWatch Women's Health 2003;2003:6-6.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.