You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 138 No. 9, September 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal/ Upper Foregut
 •Robotics
 •Hepatobiliary Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Major Digestive Surgery Using a Remote-Controlled Robot

The Next Revolution

Eric Vibert, MD; Christine Denet, MD; Brice Gayet, MD

Arch Surg. 2003;138:1002-1006.

Hypothesis  A remote-controlled robot can be used to perform computer-enhanced major digestive laparoscopic surgery.

Design  Cases series for assessment of the feasibility and safety of this technology in major digestive surgery.

Setting  Tertiary care referral center.

Patients  Between September 5, 2001, and December 20, 2001, 5 patients (4 men and 1 woman; mean ± SD age, 66 ± 5 years) underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy, proctectomy, restoration of continuity after Hartmann operation, Whipple procedure, and right liver lobectomy. In each of the procedures, a remote-controlled robot was used to perform some stages of the surgery. During these stages, the surgeon was seated at a distance from the operating table and performed the surgery using the robot, which offers enhanced intracorporeal tool manipulation and spatial vision.

Results  Sigmoidectomy was the only procedure that was completely performed with the robot. For the other procedures, the mean ± SD duration of robot use was 25% ± 10% of the operative time. Stages of colorectal surgery, retroportal dissection, 2 anastomoses during a Whipple procedure, hepatic pedicle dissection, and initial hepatotomy were performed using the robot. This technology facilitates laparoscopic anastomoses. The principal drawbacks were the time required for robot mobilization, absence of grip strength feedback, limited availability of adapted surgical tools, and the cost of the system. There was no mortality. Two of the 5 patients experienced complications, a postoperative ileus and unexplained sepsis after the Whipple procedure, both of which were treated medically.

Conclusions  For these procedures, laparoscopic computer-enhanced surgery seems safe and feasible. This introduction of computing to major digestive surgery opens the door to enhanced-reality surgery and new types of surgical education.


From the Department of Medical and Surgical Digestive Disease, Montsouris Institute, Paris, France.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.