You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 11, November 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Colon Cancer
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Hepatobiliary Surgery
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Clinical Risk Score

Emerging as a Reliable Preoperative Prognostic Index in Hepatectomy for Colorectal Metastases

Chris D. Mann, BSc; Matthew S. Metcalfe, MBBChir; Lisa N. Leopardi, BEng(Biomed)Hon; Guy J. Maddern, MD

Arch Surg. 2004;139:1168-1172.

Hypothesis  The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of the clinical risk score (CRS), a prognostic tool developed by Fong et al, when translated to another center.

Design  This study assesses 5 independent preoperative prognostic criteria, nodal status of the primary lesion, disease-free interval, number of hepatic metastases, size of the largest metastasis, and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, to determine a preoperative CRS for each patient included in the study.

Setting  The hepatobiliary unit of The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia.

Patients  Medical records of patients admitted to The Queen Elizabeth Hospital undergoing potentially curative hepatic resection for colorectal metastases during the period of July 1993 to April 2003 were included in the study.

Main Outcome Measure  The primary outcome measure of the study was survival. The calculated CRS was analyzed with respect to patient postoperativesurvival.

Results  During the 10-year period, 77 patients underwent hepatic resection. Overall survival rates for 1, 3, and 5 years were found to be 80.9%, 57.5%, and 42.3%, respectively. One- and 5-year survival rates for CRSs of 0 and 1 were found to be 93.8% and 72.5%, respectively; for scores of 2 and 3, 76.6% and 31.2%, respectively;and for scores of 4 and 5, 75% and 0%, respectively. No patient with a CRS greater than 3 survived more than2 years.

Conclusion  This study validates the CRS, finding it to be highly predictive of patient outcome and survival.


Author Affiliations: University of Adelaide, Department of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Perioperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Measurements to Predict Curability After Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases: A Prospective Study
Oussoultzoglou et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:1150-1158.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Simplified Staging System for Predicting the Prognosis of Patients With Resectable Liver Metastasis: Development and Validation
Minagawa et al.
Arch Surg 2007;142:269-276.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

In Reply:
Liersch et al.
JCO 2006;24:2680-2681.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.