You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 11, November 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Professional Satisfaction of Women in Surgery

Results of a National Study

Adelheid End, MD; Martina Mittlboeck, PhD; Hildegunde Piza-Katzer, MD

Arch Surg. 2004;139:1208-1214.

Hypothesis  Individual, group, and organizational factors influence the professional satisfaction of women surgeons in Austria.

Design  Survey on professional and private issues sent out by mail in 2000 and 2001.

Setting  Women surgeons working in hospitals and/or in private practices and those who were retired or on maternity leave.

Participants  All 351 Austrian women surgeons of all core surgical specialties (general, trauma, pediatric, plastic, thoracic, and cardiovascular), certified or in training, were addressed.

Main Outcome Measures  Proportional odds regression models were used to correlate professional satisfaction with objectively measurable prognostic factors such as age, surgical subspecialty, status of training, type of hospital, location of work (federal states vs the capital), status of activity (active vs on maternity leave), profession of private partner, number of children, and subjectively assessed prognostic factors such as operative volume and departmental organization.

Results  The response rate was 58.7% (206/351). One hundred eighty-seven surgeons—active or on maternity leave—were included in the analysis. Higher satisfaction was reported by active surgeons in subspecialties, certified surgeons, comparatively younger and older surgeons, surgeons working in hospitals outside the capital, and surgeons with a physician as a partner. When entering subjectively assessed variables into the model, the quality of departmental organization and operative volume (P<.001), as well as the status of activity (P<.001), had the strongest effect.

Conclusions  Women surgeons’ professional satisfaction highly depends on departmental organization and status of activity. Inadequate leadership, low operative volume, and being on maternity leave have a negative effect on job satisfaction. Private factors seem to be of little influence. Optimal departmental organization would help women to reconcile their professional and their private lives.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Cardiothoracic Surgery (Dr End) and Medical Computer Sciences (Dr Mittlboeck), University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; and Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and the Ludwig-Boltzmann Institute for Quality Control in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (Dr Piza-Katzer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Gender and the Surgical Workforce
Quinlan
Arch Surg 2007;142:321-328.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.